dirrell lost withhout any debate...

[Mersey]

"other people" need glasses.

there was nothing close about that fight.

Because they don't agree with you?

People are allowed there own opinions, just because they don't agree with you, it doesn't mean they need glasses.

This happens in every close fight, one fighter wins because he's in his hometown, the fight is a robbery.

It's all bull****, Froch won the fight, it could have gone either way just like many fights.

[Roger Mellie]

It was an ugly dirty fight,with both fighters guilty of fouls repeatedly through the fight. The level of idiocy in this forum today is nothing short of staggering. Dirrell was negative as hell,and when he watches the fight again he will want to kick himself because he could have left no doubt if he chose to stick with what was working well for him. Credit to Froch for sticking to his task,but he looked dreadful at times. I cant give him to much grief about the hitting the side and the back of the head when Dirrell would turn his head every time Froch went to throw.

At the end of the fight I really didnt know what to think,and as for the judges I do have a modicum of sympathy. Earlier in the evening we saw Abraham vs Taylor,a fight that was easy to score. The judges must have had a nightmare trying to score the Froch Dirrell fight.

A close fight doesnt constitute a robbery,but I fully expected this kind of BS today. I had it a draw,maybe Dirrell by 1 point, but I could see how someone else might see it the other way.

[mr.thraz]

Because they don't agree with you?

People are allowed there own opinions, just because they don't agree with you, it doesn't mean they need glasses.

This happens in every close fight, one fighter wins because he's in his hometown, the fight is a robbery.

It's all bull****, Froch won the fight, it could have gone either way just like many fights.

i could have the opinion of the sky being blood red today, that wont make so.

bush had the opinion that w.m.d. were in Iraq that didn't make it so.

and you can have the opinion that froch won but you'd be just as mistaken

[Special K]

Can understand why most Americans think Dirrell won. On an amateur scoring basis he'd have probably got the decision, but in the pro game...never in a million years!

[slimshandy69]

. The level of idiocy in this forum today is nothing short of staggering. .

i have you in that "level of idiocy" if you have dirrell who had a bloodied face froch frochs landed jabs all night winning by a point...

froch landed better body shots, landed some decent shots thoughg dirrell rolled them and lanbded by far more jabs hence dirrells face being a mess...

I was there live and not soke southern armchair fan...


Dirrell literaslly have periods of not throwing a puch where froch continually jabs his face...

[Mersey]

i could have the opinion of the sky being blood red today, that wont make so.

bush had the opinion that w.m.d. were in Iraq that didn't make it so.

and you can have the opinion that froch won but you'd be just as mistaken

I'd be mistaken?

Go on the news website and see who won

[FreshOutOfHell]

firstly your boxing knowledge is dreadful...froch landsed the jabs all night, hence why dirrells eyes weere claong sand his nose was bleeding...

Froch didnt have one scratch, and was looking handsome..

FAroch landed better body shots...and nearly landed money shots had it not been for dirrells world class defence...

aS FOR ABRAHAM and kessler styles make fight and they suit froch style...

Tell me your precise prediction of how Froch will win those fights.

To me
Abraham has an awsome defense, and more "pop" than anyone in the tourney.
Kessler just has Froch beat at any skill of the game.

[mr.thraz]

Can understand why most Americans think Dirrell won. On an amateur scoring basis he'd have probably got the decision, but in the pro game...never in a million years!

what are you trying to say? we box like amateurs over here.?

last i checked your side of the pond had the amateur style rep.

[Roger Mellie]

i have you in that "level of idiocy" if you have dirrell who had a bloodied face froch frochs landed jabs all night winning by a point...

froch landed better body shots, landed some decent shots thoughg dirrell rolled them and lanbded by far more jabs hence dirrells face being a mess...

I was there live and not soke southern armchair fan...


Dirrell literaslly have periods of not throwing a puch where froch continually jabs his face...

You are talking to a froch fan, and if you read the very last line of my post,and then read your own back to yourself,then the penny might just drop about what I meant by the level of idiocy. And I meant that of posters on both sides of the debate,ok mate?

[mr.thraz]

I'd be mistaken?

Go on the news website and see who won

that ugly mother****er lost that fight,

even if he won it on the bull**** scorecards.