Who had the better career at Welterweight: Pacquiao or Crawford?

[djtmal]

I mean you can keep repeating it if you like,

I do what I do

He was the best ww and he fought like it

[IronDanHamza]

I do what I do

He was the best ww and he fought like it

3rd best. I know your IQ is as non existant as your fat whore mothers self respect the day she married her brother and birthed your dumbass but even someone as brain dead as you should surely understand that the numbers 1 and 2 come before 3.

Otherwise, Hagler was never #1 and never beat a ranked fighter in his career. AMIRIGHT?

[djtmal]

3rd best.:

Thee best

After Manny beat him he was thee best ww his last hurrah

The end of an all time great career after the ugas loss

[IronDanHamza]

Thee best

After Manny beat him he was thee best ww his last hurrah

Do you know what numbers are, fat boy?

You know the 2019 rankings and the big #3 next to Keith Thurman's name? That means he was the third person in the rankings, meaning that two other male human boxers were ahead of him in the position 2 and 1. You know the numbers 2 and 1 don't you? 1= best. 2= second best. 3= third best. The third best can't be the best.

Or do you need your crack addicted daddy to put Sesame Street on for you again so you can learn to count to 3 for the 500th time

You stupid cunt.

[Coverdale]

Do you know what numbers are, fat boy?

You know the 2019 rankings and the big #3 next to Keith Thurman's name? That means he was the third person in the rankings, meaning that two other male human boxers were ahead of him in the position 2 and 1. You know the numbers 2 and 1 don't you? 1= best. 2= second best. 3= third best. The third best can't be the best.

Or do you need your crack addicted daddy to put Sesame Street on for you again so you can learn to count to 3 for the 500th time

You stupid cunt.

Really seems like you could do with a break to be honest.

[IronDanHamza]

Really seems like you could do with a break to be honest.

Break's are for the faint hearted.

I need to get to the bottom of the numbers dispute. What's your 2p? 3rd = The best or no?

[Coverdale]

Break's are for the faint hearted.

I need to get to the bottom of the numbers dispute. What's your 2p? 3rd = The best or no?

Haven't thought about it and I don't care. I lost interest in Pacquiao's career after the Mayweather fight.

I don't understand what you guys get out of bickering over these trivialities. Mayweather, Pacquiao, Crawford, Usyk, Canelo are/were supremely talented people who literally made themselves into historic figures. Beside a few unhappy imbeciles one encounters on the internet, most people recognise that.

[djtmal]

Do you know what numbers are,

Do you know who the best ww was Thurman when he beat Garcia and Porter to unify at ww

[IronDanHamza]

Haven't thought about it and I don't care. I lost interest in Pacquiao's career after the Mayweather fight.

I don't understand what you guys get out of bickering over these trivialities. Mayweather, Pacquiao, Crawford, Usyk, Canelo are/were supremely talented people who literally made themselves into historic figures. Beside a few unhappy imbeciles one encounters on the internet, most people recognise that.

Idiocy generally annoys me. It is a weakens of mine, I must admit. For example If I see someone say the 3rd ranked fighter in the world equates to the best fighter in that division at the time I can't help but say something.

Kind of like when Roger Rabbit drinks the alcohol and has an uncontrollable melt down. Not ideal but can sort certain problems out.

Swings and roundabouts.

[IronDanHamza]

Do you know who the best ww was Thurman when he beat Garcia and Porter to unify at ww

Actually, the 3rd best.

He was ranked #3.

Hate to break it to ya. Those pesky facts getting in the way of your fantasies again.