NSB PICK EM 2025: ROUND 1. PICK EM #17 - #20: SATURDAY 1st MARCH

[Tatabanya]

Tatabanya, Donovan, DEC, clear
Tatabanya, Puello, DEC, close
Tatabanya, Russell, KO, mid
Tatabanya, Davis, KO, mid

[Joseph]

Crocker, DEC, Close
Puello, DEC, Close
Valenzuela, DEC, Clear
Davis, KO, Mid

[HisExcellency]

His Excellency

Donovan Dec Clear
Puello Dec Close
Russell KO late
Tank KO late

[Tatabanya]

A gentle request to everybody, in order to help old Tatabanya doing the maths: when you decide to change a pick, please edit your original post rather than adding new ones with the changed pick.

Of course this is not valid when one or more fights in a given weekend have already happened. In that case, it's obviously required to change the pick of an upcoming fight in a new post.

[Joseph]

A gentle request to everybody, in order to help old Tatabanya doing the maths: when you decide to change a pick, please edit your original post rather than adding new ones with the changed pick.

Haha, I think this is where I got tripped up trying to help you out on the last PICK 'EM.

[Tatabanya]

Haha, I think this is where I got tripped up trying to help you out on the last PICK 'EM.

Only in a couple of instances. It was great help nonetheless, buddy - thanks again

[NC Uppercut]

NC Uppercut
Tank, KO Mid
GA Russell, late KO
Martin, close decision
Donovan, late KO

[KING S.O.G]

KING S.O.G

Donovan, Dec, Close
Puello, Dec, Close
Russell, KO, Late
Davis, KO, Mid

[joe strong]

Donovan, DEC, close
Puello, DEC, close
Russell, KO late
Davis, KO, mid

[HisExcellency]

PICK EM CREW Tatabanya Joseph Citizen Koba

Firstly, BIG RESPECT to you guys for Pick 'Em - it's a great, fun way for forum users to test their boxing knowledge against each other and I appreciate the hard work you guys put into organising it. Sht can't be easy!

However, like I mentioned to Tata the other week, personally I feel that the multiplier spoils the game because it SKEWS the results. For example, if you look at the table as it stands right now, the guys at the top have used up almost all of their multipliers as opposed to the guys at the bottom. Kudos to them for picking wisely but they're so far ahead of the competition that it's going to be extremely difficult for everybody else to catch up (unless they also pick the right multipliers).

Therefore, I propose creating 2 tables:- one with the results of the multiplier and one without. Whilst I appreciate that this is a LOT of work and will probably take some time to put together, issuing 2 tables would give a better indication as to who has truly made the correct number of picks over a given time period. For example, in Football (Soccer), teams are awarded 3 points for every victory but you don't earn bonus points (akin to a multiplier) for beating a stronger opponent or scoring 'X' number of goals. Therefore, I believe that Pick 'Em should work in the same way.