Comments Thread For: Benn-Eubank April 26 in soccer stadium; undercard includes Billam-Smith, Yarde, Riley and Smith-McKenna
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Oh we are dumb enough to potentially over pay for this no title, no substance and low level **** .
we could also be sitting there during an April shower and a low temperature waiting for two domestic level fighters to enter the ring and at the same get mugged for food and drink at the venue so yes we are as a nation dumb enough .
Comment
-
The only two things little Benn had two of was failed drugs tests on saperate occasions . I'll tell you again ...last time , then I'm done with you . The BBBOC is run on a 'strict liability'
which means if drugs were found INSIDE your body which they were twice with Benn on separate occasions of which he doesn't deny .Then you should tell them how and why ,it's their rules , if through vitamins, drinks etc, etc. Benn never complied directly to the board and got licensed to fight from other governing bodies over sea's instead .Who seemed happy (with the sanction fee's) and the fact of a bizarre suggestion by WBC of a ridiculously high intake of eggs , which even Benn didn't seem happy with , but it got the job done. It's been deemed by VADA and the independentsporting body that it couldn't't be proven that Benn took these drugs knowingly and maybe , just maybe he didn't .The concern I have around benn's innocence is the fact that at great expense he got a dossier of information that he said would clearly 'exonerate' him and prove his innocence once and for all ...he's never made this public ? I hope for us all he does! The BBBOC have lost their teeth as Simon Jordon says on this matter ( you should watch it BBC talksport boxing .it will explain in even more detail) in the fact that they , Robert Smith , look likely to , and maybe at this stage already have sanctioned this contest .Hence NOT ever being in the same room to be made able to enforce what they did with all other fighters ....'strict liability'. There's also of 'smoke' in the room and neither Benn or the board have handled this well.
Apologies to others for this long winded account .Doping in our sport is killing it.Comment
-
You’d be better off apologising for your flat out idiocy than your long winded post.
The only two things little Benn had two of was failed drugs tests on saperate occasions . I'll tell you again ...last time , then I'm done with you . The BBBOC is run on a 'strict liability'
which means if drugs were found INSIDE your body which they were twice with Benn on separate occasions of which he doesn't deny .Then you should tell them how and why ,it's their rules , if through vitamins, drinks etc, etc. Benn never complied directly to the board and got licensed to fight from other governing bodies over sea's instead .Who seemed happy (with the sanction fee's) and the fact of a bizarre suggestion by WBC of a ridiculously high intake of eggs , which even Benn didn't seem happy with , but it got the job done. It's been deemed by VADA and the independentsporting body that it couldn't't be proven that Benn took these drugs knowingly and maybe , just maybe he didn't .The concern I have around benn's innocence is the fact that at great expense he got a dossier of information that he said would clearly 'exonerate' him and prove his innocence once and for all ...he's never made this public ? I hope for us all he does! The BBBOC have lost their teeth as Simon Jordon says on this matter ( you should watch it BBC talksport boxing .it will explain in even more detail) in the fact that they , Robert Smith , look likely to , and maybe at this stage already have sanctioned this contest .Hence NOT ever being in the same room to be made able to enforce what they did with all other fighters ....'strict liability'. There's also of 'smoke' in the room and neither Benn or the board have handled this well.
Apologies to others for this long winded account .Doping in our sport is killing it.
Conor Benn had TWO hearings with the BBBoC/UKAD, this is public information. Google it you fucking retard.
Of those two hearing, he won both. The first one the BBBoC/UKAD appealed the loss and it was overturned. They then had ANOTHER hearing which Benn won and was CLEARED of all wrong doing.
Again, this is public record. This isn’t some secret hidden information. Benn had two hearings, with BBBoC/UKAD where he presented his evidence and he WON and was thus cleared. Which is the literal exact reason WHY this fight is being sanctioned by the BBBoC because Benn won his hearing with them and was cleared to fight.
Is there any scenario where this sinks into your thick skull?Last edited by IronDanHamza; 01-24-2025, 05:27 AM.Comment
-
Listen kid I done all I can for you ....I't's clear nothing will help...I don't want to hear another peep out of you , BUT I attend a lot of shows in and around London IF you care for a lemonade some time it would be a pleasure to discuss this further ....
You’d be better off apologising for your flat out idiocy than your long winded post.
Conor Benn had TWO hearings with the BBBoC/UKAD, this is public information. Google it you fucking retard.
Of those two hearing, he won both. The first one the BBBoC/UKAD appealed the loss and it was overturned. They then had ANOTHER hearing which Benn won and was CLEARED of all wrong doing.
Again, this is public record. This isn’t some secret hidden information. Benn had two hearings, with BBBoC/UKAD where he presented his evidence and he WON and was thus cleared. Which is the literal exact reason WHY this fight is being sanctioned by the BBBoC because Benn won his hearing with them and was cleared to fight.
Is there any scenario where this sinks into your thick skull?Comment
-
Are you brain dead? Google it, you RETARD!
Here, I will do it for you since you seem incapable;
https://www.skysports.com/amp/boxing...ban-next-month
https://premierboxingvault.com/conor...spension-fate/
https://www.morgansl.com/en/latest/c...enn-exonerated
Here are 3 links for Conor Benn’s hearings with BBBoC/UKAD. Which he WON, and was CLEARED.
Honestly what are you not getting? Are you thick or were you just born slow?
Why do you think Benn is allowed to fight in this country under a BBBoC license now and previously wasn’t? Why do you think that is? Could it be the HEARING that he won and thus was cleared you dumb fuck
Last edited by IronDanHamza; 01-24-2025, 07:06 AM.Comment
-
You've got to stop it now , your'e going to make yourself poorly ....Please move on , your'e not being fair to yourself ...
Are you brain dead? Google it, you RETARD!
Here, I will do it for you since you seem incapable;
https://www.skysports.com/amp/boxing...ban-next-month
https://premierboxingvault.com/conor...spension-fate/
https://www.morgansl.com/en/latest/c...enn-exonerated
Here are 3 links for Conor Benn’s hearings with BBBoC/UKAD. Which he WON, and was CLEARED.
Honestly what are you not getting? Are you thick or were you just born slow?
Why do you think Benn is allowed to fight in this country under a BBBoC license now and previously wasn’t? Why do you think that is? Could it be the HEARING that he won and thus was cleared you dumb fuck
Comment
Comment