Comments Thread For: Katie Taylor open to trilogy bouts with Amanda Serrano and Chantelle Cameron
Collapse
-
Amanda won in the eyes of many a deduction should have led to a loss max without the point it could be argued a tie yet Amanda won 2 fights in most the publica eyes she's seen as a champ or bigger fan base after such showings -
Imo , it was a robbery
That’s on Amanda and her coach fam. Amanda had a better time with Taylor but chose to fight on the inside to out muscle Katie, it wasn’t gonna win her the fight. Amanda has the faster hands why fight on the inside when you can two piece your way to a victory. It’s the same way that cotto got his azz taxed by Margarito (wraps or no wraps) you don’t fight on the inside against people who have that as their best weapon. Listen to Maldonado in her corner, dude didn’t give her shhh for guidance.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
A siders n boxing u either like them or not lollll cant have it both ways u like them when u sopport them but hate them when u want them to lose, boxing101Leave a comment:
-
Why would people be emotionally wanting Serrano to win?
People emotionally wanted Serrano to win. I had bets on her both times but she relied too much on landing glancing shots and ate a whole bunch of combos. I lost my bets and didn’t feel any controversy, even with the head clash. Not a a Taylor fan but respect her champion pedigree but Serrano lost that first fight and went for a ko in the second and had she fought smarter the second fight would’ve won it but she went in there for a stoppage and got pieced up the second half of the fight.
I agree that it was way too much of amanda following katie around and taking quivk punches but those little flurrys were not enough for Amanda's overall work rate.
The fact she was deducted a point and still won a comfortable decision is the definition of robbery.
In a 10 round fight that means if not for the deduction,they gave Taylor 7 out of 10 rndsLeave a comment:
-
That’s on Amanda and her coach fam. Amanda had a better time with Taylor but chose to fight on the inside to out muscle Katie, it wasn’t gonna win her the fight. Amanda has the faster hands why fight on the inside when you can two piece your way to a victory. It’s the same way that cotto got his azz taxed by Margarito (wraps or no wraps) you don’t fight on the inside against people who have that as their best weapon. Listen to Maldonado in her corner, dude didn’t give her shhh for guidance.Leave a comment:
-
dontg remmeber that to be honest persoon is a belgium police lady lol
Leave a comment:
-
And everything in woman's boxing is against good punchers. 2-minute rounds, this reliance on amateur type scoring... No sense of damage done. It's just ridiculous.Leave a comment:
-
Katie can do the wrong... Just a downhome honest wholesome pixy! When Katie grunts and her hand moves out? She obviously connects. And every time she gets rocked it's obviously a glancing blow...
Just nice white wholesome Katie smells like lemon pledge! When Katie fights? Sven Otke gets jealous!Leave a comment:
-
The way these fights are scored can be ridiculous because Taylor gets credit for anything she throws. Serrano obviously had the more damaging punches in both encounters. We're not even talking about the illegal head butts in the second fight.
I didn’t score either Serrano fight, but it seemed to me Amanda won both — especially the second encounter. That said, the fans on Boxrec scored the first bout for Katie and the sound one a draw. It would seem that the people who thought Serrano won both matches are much more vocal than those in the Taylor camp. And I suppose that makes sense because, why would the people on the side of the winner complain? Anyway, the point is, there are quite a lot of people who thought Katie won both fights.
I can honestly think of no measure by which Taylor won both of those fights. If this was isolated I wouldn't even be so upset however she lost at least two more matches including two some tough Eastern European woman brawler and again it was so obvious.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: