Originally posted by DClefthook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Today vs. 25 years ago: Which heavyweight division was superior?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Nightfall View PostToday's heavy weights will get slaughtered. Prime Mike Tyson sends Usyk to the moon
Honestly what would Usyk do to Botha?Last edited by low blows; 01-01-2025, 03:10 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wrecksracer View Post
Boxing is largely skills based, and current fighters seem to have regressed. Take a guy like Tank Davis, who only fights guys he knows he can beat. Does he beat Roberto Duran, who faced everybody with every possible style? I'm not seeing that in current fighters. They just don't fight often enough. There are a few who would be competitive in any era. Usyk, Inoue, Bam Rodriguez.
Comment
-
Oh yeah, man.
Outside of Usyk & Fury, who'd be trouble for anybody ever due to their size & skill, there's just no way anybody else fighting today would have anything for prime-Lennox, Holyfield, Ike Ibeabuchi, David Tua, and even a past his prime Mike Tyson.
Comment
-
The 1990s; When boxing was still mainstream and popular. Had Hall of Fame fighters like: Mike Tyson, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis. Need I say more?
That heavyweight division was superior. I would also venture to say that the 1960s was perhaps the second greatest division in boxing’s heavyweight history.
Only second to the 1970s.shwaap likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by BodyBagz View PostThis era is the shlttiest era of them all
Tyson's "youngest champ" era 2nd.
I'm trying to think what the biggest HW fight was between like 2005 and 2014. It was such a dead era.
Comment
-
Originally posted by steeve steel View Post
But if you look at training techniques, diet AND the fact today's boxers don't fight as often, then I would have to go with the idea that fighters today, evenly matched with those of the past, would have an edge.
Comment
Comment