Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Trainer opinion: Tyson Fury needs new approach vs. Oleksandr Usyk

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Boro View Post

    Where did I compare anyone you clown? YOU called him "brown bomber" Joe Louis's alias not me, engage your brain son.
    Ah yes, the paternalistic approach. Always a good argument, you brown boozer!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by RigosPressureCooker View Post

      Have you missed your short bus?
      Ah yes, the "7 posts" specialist. Did Boxingscene ban you because you were too dull and irrelevant so you had to start all over again under a new name (that's also dull and irrelevant) ?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

        Ah yes, the "7 posts" specialist. Did Boxingscene ban you because you were too dull and irrelevant so you had to start all over again under a new name (that's also dull and irrelevant) ?
        Ah yes, "7 cm" dick.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by RigosPressureCooker View Post

          Ah yes, "7 cm" dick.
          Still better than no balls!

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

            Ah yes, the paternalistic approach. Always a good argument, you brown boozer!

            No one was making an argument, just stating facts.

            I know you're slow but damn, it's somewhat embarrassing for you, that you'd firstly make the assertion I was comparing Wilder to Joe Louis by pointing out your failure when using the aforementioned alias.

            And secondly implying that I'm "arguing" by simply doing so.

            Either you have no grasp on the English language or you're mentally challenged.

            And is "brown boozer" supposed to somehow be offensive!? If so, lol.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Boro View Post


              No one was making an argument, just stating facts.

              I know you're slow but damn, it's somewhat embarrassing for you, that you'd firstly make the assertion I was comparing Wilder to Joe Louis by pointing out your failure when using the aforementioned alias.

              And secondly implying that I'm "arguing" by simply doing so.

              Either you have no grasp on the English language or you're mentally challenged.

              And is "brown boozer" supposed to somehow be offensive!? If so, lol.
              Man, that must have taken you ages to write , specially using vocabulary you're not accustomed to. But bravo for the effort! Considering your "condition" it's quite a feat..you brown doser!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

                Man, that must have taken you ages to write , specially using vocabulary you're not accustomed to. But bravo for the effort! Considering your "condition" it's quite a feat..you brown doser!
                Yeah clearly took me ages to write .

                And imagine the extent of your "witty" comeback is to mirror me calling you mentally challenged by implying I have a condition.

                Essentially boiling down the aforementioned witty comeback to "but you though".

                And not only that failing to spell dosser but nice try son, bonus points for the attempt, it's cute when ret@rds try, maybe mommy will give you a gold star.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Boro View Post

                  Yeah clearly took me ages to write .

                  And imagine the extent of your "witty" comeback is to mirror me calling you mentally challenged by implying I have a condition.

                  Essentially boiling down the aforementioned witty comeback to "but you though".

                  And not only that failing to spell dosser but nice try son, bonus points for the attempt, it's cute when ret@rds try, maybe mommy will give you a gold star.
                  Well for starters, you seem to have issues with "mom", it comes up a lot. Also what's with the whole calling people "son? . Seems like a clear sign of daddy issues, emanating from your problems with authority. It all originates from your unwillingness to accept who you truly are: a failure, a bitter deadbeat keyboard warrior, Trying to be condescending, treating people like you have been all your life. The weight of being denigrated for your limited abilities, taking it out on strangers, infuriated by what you believe to be mistreatment and injustice. The world is filled with frustrated losers like yourself. Thank god, some of them wake up and get help before it's too late.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

                    Well for starters, you seem to have issues with "mom", it comes up a lot. Also what's with the whole calling people "son? . Seems like a clear sign of daddy issues, emanating from your problems with authority. It all originates from your unwillingness to accept who you truly are: a failure, a bitter deadbeat keyboard warrior, Trying to be condescending, treating people like you have been all your life. The weight of being denigrated for your limited abilities, taking it out on strangers, infuriated by what you believe to be mistreatment and injustice. The world is filled with frustrated losers like yourself. Thank god, some of them wake up and get help before it's too late.
                    You tried son but no, not only do I have no issues with either of my parents or authority.

                    Can't exactly be a deadbeat when all my kids are looked after properly and attended top end schools and I'm worth more than your entire bloodline and have been retired since I was 31 and living off passive income since.

                    But it's cute that you're one of these generic internet psychologist types, who believes (wrongly) you have a clue about anyone or anything.

                    But in reality you're just a terminally online weirdo following the aforementioned internet psychologist trend with no doctorate or actual real interactions with people.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Boro View Post

                      You tried son but no, not only do I have no issues with either of my parents or authority.

                      Can't exactly be a deadbeat when all my kids are looked after properly and attended top end schools and I'm worth more than your entire bloodline and have been retired since I was 31 and living off passive income since.

                      But it's cute that you're one of these generic internet psychologist types, who believes (wrongly) you have a clue about anyone or anything.

                      But in reality you're just a terminally online weirdo following the aforementioned internet psychologist trend with no doctorate or actual real interactions with people.
                      Whoahahahahahahaha! And yet you say you have no issues! Priceless... What else? Are you gonna show me your report card from second grade, the one that says still struggles to tie his shoes but shows proof of a bright future? Dear God.. And we're suppose to believe all this crap because?? Ah yes, because you're Boro from a boxing forum! Hahahahaha Jesus... Do you not get it? Do you not understand my comment was meant to expose what kind of douchbag you really are? And you're so full of yourself that you cannot fathom that people could actually take advantage of you. Man if I keep this up, soon I'll know your date of birth, your address, where you work, your bank account #, why your wife left you and why your imaginary children don't visit you...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP