Comments Thread For: Too many IBF leading contenders don't merit any ranking, let alone mandatory status

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35678
    • 3,831
    • 3,378
    • 378,304

    #41
    Originally posted by famicommander

    They're all worthless cancers on the sport. It causes casuals like you to declare people that have never even fought anybody good a "world champion"
    Oh no, I got called a casual

    Comment

    • Poopdick
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2021
      • 1379
      • 656
      • 915
      • 0

      #42
      these top guys need to stop paying for ibf belt and get rid of them for good. no excuse to have these no hope mandatories fighting for these belts taken away from real champs.

      Comment

      • Poopdick
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2021
        • 1379
        • 656
        • 915
        • 0

        #43
        Originally posted by elfag
        yeah IBF is trash. *** them its the 3 belt era now, no more 4 belt era. Their mandatories are complete trash, every time its some random nobody you never heard of before is the mandatory and they play hardball and take away the belt even when these guys got contractual rematches.



        If you have all 3 belts that arent IBF then I consider you the unified champion still.
        2 belt now WBA no longer recognized thankfully

        Comment

        • Poopdick
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2021
          • 1379
          • 656
          • 915
          • 0

          #44
          Originally posted by The D3vil
          Maybe we need to start treating the IBF the way we treat the IBO
          them white sneakers lmao lol

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48407
            • 4,792
            • 267
            • 104,043

            #45
            Originally posted by famicommander

            He was ranked based off a robbery. Plain and simple.
            Erm, no he wasn't.

            And even if that were true, so was Ricky Burns, who you deem "elite and great win" for Crawford () on the sole reason due to being ranked in the Top 5 when THAT was an actual robbery. So, explain?

            It's just overt contradiction from you. There is no way around it from whatever goalpost you try to move, it just comes straight back to that .It's genuinely embarrassing honestly.

            You put all this stock into rankings, don't shut the fuck up about them, cite them all the time to justify your undying fanboyism for the likes of Inoue etc by deeming totally dead average fighters as "elite wins" for no other reason than they are ranked highly then turn around and say fighters ranked in the exact same position "suck" because it doesn't fit your pathetic agenda.

            Sorry, won't wash. Either be consistent on your position or shut the fuck up. Those are your only two options.
            Last edited by IronDanHamza; 10-23-2024, 01:39 PM.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 48407
              • 4,792
              • 267
              • 104,043

              #46
              Originally posted by Mammoth

              Oh no, I got called a casual
              Very emotional, that poster.

              Could be their time of the month.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP