For years Bakrahm Murtazaliev was content to have poor showings against low level fighters and taking step aside money

[Mammoth]

he was ibf mandatory (#1) for 4 1/2 years. when charlo was unifying, they had in writing that murtazaliev is next. then charlo still ignored this man and decided to fight once a year for a few more years. then he did NOTHING and held the belts hostage (this is what i hate so much in pro boxing) instead of vacating all of them.

finally bakhram won the title this year. i thought they intended to kill him when i saw the fight is on ramadan. now he defended it against the highest rated available contender. lubin refused their eliminator which means tim was next.

this is what a champion should do. but this is what you hate ibf for. they order eliminator but some privileged boxers refuse. then you get guys who actually want to fight in eliminators but they are not american in many cases. then "fans" call them nobodies, bums, undeserved mandatories, weak etc.
1) boxing is NOT only americans for americans.
2) ibf, murtazaliev, fortea, eifert, meng, hrgovic, dasmarinas, karen are NOT the guys you should criticize. those who deserve that are boxers like lubin for refusing eliminators. NOBODY talk about that. i never saw anybody else here call out those fighters. people don't criticize thurman for his totally undeserving scheduled shot at tim (champion) in march. when in reality if lubins and thurmans and buatsis fought in eliminators when they could/should, there would be no reason to complain about mandatories or sanctioning bodies.
3) if murtazaliev demanded immediate shot when he first could, EVERYBODY here would hate him even if that's his right. imagine the outrage and offensive words thrown at jermell and bakhram if they fought (like they SHOULD) then instead of undisputed unification 1 & 2. obviously bakhram would have liked his shot when he was 27 more than now (31 years old, not young, end of prime). nobody cares about that because he's not from usa, uk and mexico. people here only care about fighters from these 3 countries (or 1 of them) until at least (for some fans) a boxer becomes borderline hall of famer. if you only watch 2-3 american channels, sky in britain and do no research, obviously you wouldn't know much. what kind of fan is that? then you only know about fighters which are hyped/promoted by 3-4 biggest promoters in america and england and absolutely nothing more. of course everybody is a bum, weak mandatory and boxing is dying to you when you are uninformed on the subject.
4) if there were no eliminators and enforced mandatories, boxing would be even worse, totally unworthy of following. it would be all inhouse random fights until a champion is over 30. then 1 tough fight cashout and retirement. that would be total trash of a sport. again, blame fighters like buatsi who was rated wbc, wba and wbo #1 and the second best rated ibf challenger. he could have fought bivol last year or this year after bivol defeated his mandatory zurdo and was free. i hate fighters/cowards like that. i have seen exactly zero posts calling buatsi out for this. but you have the gall to talk bad about boxers who want to fight eliminators and are unknown to you because you refuse to research.

i can't make this up. boxing fans are the worst definitely.

If Charlo ever refused he would have been stripped. Cut the ****.

[daggum]

tim tszyu definitely doesnt know how to step aside

[Mammoth]

Dude looks like crap against guys that Zayas and Anthony Fowler blew through with no problem then he starts stopping guys who are proven to be super durable.

Seems weird to me. Not that there aren't late bloomers but still, seems weird...

[crimsonfalcon07]

If Charlo ever refused he would have been stripped. Cut the ****.

Just like Spence got stripped for only defending his IBF title one time in 4 years... Oh wait. And those two from the same stable too. Cut your own nonsense. IBF is very far from perfect, and this narrative that they're good at following rules is inaccurate at best.