Comments Thread For: Artur Beterbiev-Dmitry Bivol just the latest in a year of controversial decisions

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tokon
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 7647
    • 1,827
    • 1,298
    • 42,234

    #11
    Originally posted by Boro

    All fights that go to points potentially if not just by their very nature are "controversial" given it's meaning (give rise to prolonged public disagreement or heated discussion​).
    Yes, that's what the judges are there for.

    Comment

    • Bob
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2019
      • 2092
      • 1,089
      • 1,867
      • 28,232

      #12
      Written like bn24 clickbait rubbish, which is all this is.

      It wasn't contraversial, it was a close fight with swing rounds.
      Usyk Fury, are you serious!?
      Last edited by Bob; 10-20-2024, 07:33 AM.

      Comment

      • MONGOOSE66
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2011
        • 7739
        • 1,609
        • 620
        • 29,199

        #13
        Only controversial to casuals. Competitive fight. I enjoyed it. You cant win going backwards 80-90% of the time.
        I have more appreciation for Bivol. Fantastic fighter but he lost in my opinion.

        Comment

        • The plunger man
          the minge monster
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2014
          • 9139
          • 1,021
          • 263
          • 67,551

          #14
          Close fight that was razor thin and could have gone either way…I preferred bivol skill set during the fight but if Beterbiev won its to close to argue…however 116-112 was way out of line and no way was that a correct scorecard

          Comment

          • billeau2
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 27644
            • 6,396
            • 14,933
            • 339,839

            #15
            Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
            Only controversial to casuals. Competitive fight. I enjoyed it. You cant win going backwards 80-90% of the time.
            I have more appreciation for Bivol. Fantastic fighter but he lost in my opinion.
            Amen! A lot of people are still believe boxing matches are only about how many punches are landed. There's actually more to it and effective aggression counts.

            Comment

            • Boxing 112
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2022
              • 1816
              • 785
              • 167
              • 0

              #16
              Originally posted by Raimondo
              A rematch would settle this dispute. Close fight.
              There is no dispute. You lot acting like it was even split. Not even 1 judge gave it to Bivol. No rematch needed.

              Comment

              • LAchargers373
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2019
                • 4242
                • 2,082
                • 1,770
                • 4,965

                #17
                Originally posted by Boxing 112

                There is no dispute. You lot acting like it was even split. Not even 1 judge gave it to Bivol. No rematch needed.
                Why wouldn’t you want to see a rematch? it was very close great fight. All the greats fight each other a couple of times that’s like historical lol. U mad weird

                Comment

                • jereme12
                  Amateur
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Sep 2024
                  • 10
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  • 0

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Boxing 112

                  There is no dispute. You lot acting like it was even split. Not even 1 judge gave it to Bivol. No rematch needed.
                  "Judges"? Seriously? Like in Bivol-Canelo fight after Bivol won 10 rounds? Remove that handicap and Bivol beat Beterbiev comfortably on the cards.

                  Comment

                  • vitali1999
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 4696
                    • 230
                    • 43
                    • 33,565

                    #19
                    And the year still isn't over. Gonna be a lot of sad people December 21st

                    Comment

                    • Boro
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2020
                      • 2087
                      • 915
                      • 89
                      • 2,586

                      #20
                      Originally posted by tokon

                      Yes, that's what the judges are there for.
                      Judges don't alleviate controversy arguably they only add to it, particularly when there isn't open scoring.

                      And plenty of cards seem to be scored in very peculiar manners or in such a way the scoring allows them to dig one fighter or another out a hole, despite logic and reason indicating they shouldn't of won some of (if not all) of the questionable rounds that were given to them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP