Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Artur Beterbiev didn't like the fight, yet still beats brilliant Dmitry Bivol

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

    The fact bivol was -150 favourite is what made the line suspect. If u understand betting you know that would’ve been a huge red flag indicator. Beterbiev awith 100% KO rate and a decorated resume should’ve been the clear favourite. This is what’s know as a betting trap. Bivol -150 was a trap. You are acting like the majority of people didn’t score the fight for Bivol. Claiming that “casuals” are what’s causing the “controversy” lol. Thats not the case. Most people thought Bivol won but because it was a close fight we can’t really complain too much because it WAS a very close fight. It really comes down to a matter of opinion. Also if bivol won there would be no controversy. Thats a fact
    Bivol was -150 simply because he's a great fighter who has never lost, who has great technique, footwork, poise, experience and he beat Canelo fairly easily. An Beterbiev was +100 because although he is a wrecking machine, he's 39 and has had health issues. Now if you want to read "a betting trap" or see red flags, then go for it. (I guess the Murtakaliv vs Tzsyu odds were also a betting trap.. set up by the Chechen mafia... )

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

      Bivol was -150 simply because he's a great fighter who has never lost, who has great technique, footwork, poise, experience and he beat Canelo fairly easily. An Beterbiev was +100 because although he is a wrecking machine, he's 39 and has had health issues. Now if you want to read "a betting trap" or see red flags, then go for it. (I guess the Murtakaliv vs Tzsyu odds were also a betting trap.. set up by the Chechen mafia... )
      Again you don’t understand betting lol. This conversation is boring I’m getting dumber by continuing to interact with you I’m gonna go now. You take care and don’t bet on anything you won’t like how it plays out in the end tards like you never do lol

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

        Again you don’t understand betting lol. This conversation is boring I’m getting dumber by continuing to interact with you I’m gonna go now. You take care and don’t bet on anything you won’t like how it plays out in the end tards like you never do lol
        Stay salty my friend, you'll keep hurting!..

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

          Stay salty my friend, you'll keep hurting!..
          I dunno. I made a couple racks betting on catterall by decision. Crawford/Spence was one fight get over yourself no one cares. The fighters don’t know you Crawford ain’t your friend you aren’t homies stop trying to act like you are. Defending his chastity like he’s your girl lmao

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

            I dunno. I made a couple racks betting on catterall by decision. Crawford/Spence was one fight get over yourself no one cares. The fighters don’t know you Crawford ain’t your friend you aren’t homies stop trying to act like you are. Defending his chastity like he’s your girl lmao
            SO you bet on Catteral who has 13 KOs in 30 fights and was a -400 fav to win a decision. Damn bro! You so sort of Nostradamus?... Who mentioned Crawford??? Lay down the paint thinner bro, it's messing you up.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

              SO you bet on Catteral who has 13 KOs in 30 fights and was a -400 fav to win a decision. Damn bro! You so sort of Nostradamus?... Who mentioned Crawford??? Lay down the paint thinner bro, it's messing you up.
              Dunno what bum bookie gave you -400 you must be a chump lmao I got almost even money stop being a sucker kid lol

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

                Dunno what bum bookie gave you -400 you must be a chump lmao I got almost even money stop being a sucker kid lol
                Who's your booker? The crack head on the corner of Noteeth ave. and Dumpants blvd ?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

                  Who's your booker? The crack head on the corner of Noteeth ave. and Dumpants blvd ?
                  Same one that just paid me out on the dodgers winning the SB and my side bet of them to win that game when it 5-0 . Stop being a sucker lmao ….-400 hahahahaha I’ll be your bookie actually yourdumbass accepts odds like that your an easy money mark I want in on it lol

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

                    Same one that just paid me out on the dodgers winning the SB and my side bet of them to win that game when it 5-0 . Stop being a sucker lmao ….-400 hahahahaha I’ll be your bookie actually yourdumbass accepts odds like that your an easy money mark I want in on it lol
                    Can't wait to see you drive by in your new Lambo from all the money you've been making, you kingpin of the ******** world! I'm surprised the mafia hasn't put a hit on you, cleaning them out like that..

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by steeve steel View Post

                      Can't wait to see you drive by in your new Lambo from all the money you've been making, you kingpin of the ******** world! I'm surprised the mafia hasn't put a hit on you, cleaning them out like that..
                      They give me tips. Come to Montreal and find out clown lmao

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP