Holy robbery!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27929
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #11
    The right man won. We’ll see if Canelo challenges Beterbiev

    Comment

    • HandsofIron
      Super Champion in Recess
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2014
      • 3946
      • 736
      • 765
      • 25,198

      #12
      I missed it, another robbery? Dam son, f it, do a rematch.

      Comment

      • Toffee
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2018
        • 7246
        • 2,500
        • 74
        • 62,824

        #13
        Originally posted by QballLobo
        Close fight. When you’re the challenger you have to go in and take that title. Has to be convincing. Bivol fought well but I think he turned it on enough when he was doing good work. Not active enough.

        Definitely no robbery.
        Bivol had to do more because he was the challenger?

        1. You don't have to do more as the challenger
        2. He wasn't the challenger

        Comment

        • Boro
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2020
          • 2087
          • 915
          • 89
          • 2,586

          #14
          Punching forearms and gloves wins fights apparently or perhaps it's being a Muslím that gets you the nod.

          Comment

          • KO MX
            Undisputed Champion
            • Oct 2012
            • 2213
            • 145
            • 347
            • 66,448

            #15
            I had it 116-112 Bivol with a lot of close rounds, i can see the draw being fair, but theres no way Beterbiev won that fight

            Comment

            • QballLobo
              Undisputed Champion
              • Nov 2011
              • 7152
              • 1,309
              • 112
              • 48,002

              #16
              Originally posted by Toffee

              Bivol had to do more because he was the challenger?

              1. You don't have to do more as the challenger
              2. He wasn't the challenger
              To be the man you have to BEAT the man.

              Comment

              • Toffee
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2018
                • 7246
                • 2,500
                • 74
                • 62,824

                #17
                Originally posted by QballLobo

                To be the man you have to BEAT the man.
                I feel like you completely missed what this fight was.

                It was the best against the best. Champion against Champion.

                It's a shame as you probably would have enjoyed it more if you'd understood the significance of it.

                Comment

                • Chaos
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 1440
                  • 143
                  • 49
                  • 13,206

                  #18
                  Originally posted by KO MX
                  I had it 116-112 Bivol with a lot of close rounds, i can see the draw being fair, but theres no way Beterbiev won that fight
                  No one's taking seriously the opinion of a weirdo who has a picture of a guy in the tub at the bottom of every post.

                  Comment

                  • alexnation
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2018
                    • 1534
                    • 361
                    • 79
                    • 29,255

                    #19
                    I can even agree to a draw but 116-112 Beterbiev is absolutely laughable. When they said 116-112, I knew Bivol was going to win because in no universe do you give 8 rounds to Beterbiev

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP