Comments Thread For: Liam Smith: There is a reason Josh Kelly has not cut it at the top

[1Eriugenus]

'It sounds like you're not going to give Kelly much credit if he wins, but will be ready to belittle him if he loses. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't'.

I've already told you my views on Kelly. If he turns up & throws 50 left jabs every round I will reconsider my view.

[1Eriugenus]

'great? dont think they are great, unless you mean great in terms of sheer number of them fighting'.

Daggum, I'm going to just leave that out there for others to comment. I can't bring myself to say anything.

[Mammoth]

This undercard stinks. I don't care about any of these fights aside from the main event. Looks thrown together based purely on nationality.

[kiaba360]

This undercard stinks. I don't care about any of these fights aside from the main event. Looks thrown together based purely on nationality.

Dude, it's a Wembley Stadium show. The primary objective is to appeal to the UK audience. My only real gripe is Mark Chamberlain once again facing a no-hoper.

[Goatintheboat]

Let's see what Smith still has. If he gets to Kelly he'll stop him.

[knockoutkid]

Yeah but how shot id Eubank though, watch the second fight. Everytime Eubank throws his left hand he's literally flinching and closing his eyes afraid that a right hand was going to counter but smith is too washed up to throw it.

[knockoutkid]

If the smiths werent so stiff and robotic they coild have beem better, theyve all got decent chins. But they should retire cause they get hit too much. That wriggling like a fish defense on the ropes like crolla vs loma and smith did brfore he got stopped by eubank is amateurish.

[Rayzah]

Smith has been doing a lot of talking for a guy who has also not cut it at the top. The pot calling the kettle black