Stop Comparing Bud And Floyd. Bud Isn’t Even Greater Than Tim Bradley

[hugh grant]

Spence literally blanked Mikey, outboxed the guy who was considered the better boxer.

And you may not have saw him as a top P4P fighter, but every credible ranking in the world DID

Yes, the whole entire universe saw spence as a pf p no5. Everyone overrated him.
But he wasnt. Every champ in the 17 weight divisions has as good resume as spence has, he's not did anything any champ hasn't did, spence doesn't deserve favouritism

[Lance98]

Crawford's best win is a CTE ridden dude with 3 title defences in 1 weight class. Errol SPence. Dude wasn't even unified, that's how much of a bum he was. He would be a complete bum on GGG or Canelo's resume. Caleb Plant has a better resume than Errol Spence.

You are dumb. Spence looked good in his fights even after the accident, and now that he got destroyed handily by crawford, he is a CTE ridden? Just stop, you daft clown. ggg's resume is whack. He never had a big win as his wins against guys that were decent like jacobs and derevyanchenko, were controversial, and many thought he lost, struggled against a career welterweight k.brook.

[The D3vil]

Yes, the whole entire universe saw spence as a pf p no5. Everyone overrated him.
But he wasnt. Every champ in the 17 weight divisions has as good resume as spence has, he's not did anything any champ hasn't did, spence doesn't deserve favouritism

I don't think that's true.

He was champion for 6 years, in boxing's most historically rich weight class & defended the belt 7 times.

Very few people have done that.

[daggum]

You are dumb. Spence looked good in his fights even after the accident, and now that he got destroyed handily by crawford, he is a CTE ridden? Just stop, you daft clown. ggg's resume is whack. He never had a big win as his wins against guys that were decent like jacobs and derevyanchenko, were controversial, and many thought he lost, struggled against a career welterweight k.brook.

he beat prime canelo. thats better than any win floyd has for example. no big wins though? lol. and he clearly beat jacobs. i think you are referring to bad faith haters pretending ggg lost. how in the world would you get 7 rounds for jacobs? its literally not possible. i saw people on the live scoring giving jacobs the first 3 rounds...watch it back. round 1 ggg easily won with hard head snapping jabs to jacobs grazing jabs. not close. round 3 was a complete domination and people still gave it to jacobs? says a lot about their scoring accumen. so right there you have 2 rounds that are misscored and then they come back with a scorecard of jacobs by 1 point knowing they effed up their card. dervy fight could have gone either way sure and ggg was 37 so who cares. crawford just had a close one with a good fighter too. floyd vs maidana at 37. it happens. canelo stopped fighting legit guys when he was 32 years old. he also beat up and knocked out brook in 5 rounds. thats not a struggle. brook landed a couple good shots that did nothing...struggle?

[Lance98]

he beat prime canelo. thats better than any win floyd has for example. no big wins though? lol. and he clearly beat jacobs. i think you are referring to bad faith haters pretending ggg lost. how in the world would you get 7 rounds for jacobs? its literally not possible. i saw people on the live scoring giving jacobs the first 3 rounds...watch it back. round 1 ggg easily won with hard head snapping jabs to jacobs grazing jabs. not close. round 3 was a complete domination and people still gave it to jacobs? says a lot about their scoring accumen. so right there you have 2 rounds that are misscored and then they come back with a scorecard of jacobs by 1 point knowing they effed up their card. dervy fight could have gone either way sure and ggg was 37 so who cares. crawford just had a close one with a good fighter too. floyd vs maidana at 37. it happens. canelo stopped fighting legit guys when he was 32 years old. he also beat up and knocked out brook in 5 rounds. thats not a struggle. brook landed a couple good shots that did nothing...struggle?

ggg should have lost to jacobs and derevyanchenko. Jacobs outboxed him 7-5, derevyanchenko beat him up 9-3 or 8-4 if i am being generous, plus he couldn't beat a prime canelo. He got outboxed in the first fight 7-5, got bruised up in the 2nd fight 8-4 and got outclassed in the 3rd fight 12-0. Go cry more.

[Roadblock]

I don't think that's true.

He was champion for 6 years, in boxing's most historically rich weight class & defended the belt 7 times.

Very few people have done that.

Sounds good but the competition level is average compared the last era, people always throw around belts etc when they cant name fighters that stand out, they will talk about things like TCs 4 divisions but the best comp was Spence and Postal now Madrimov, in my mind its never about the belts its all about the fighters you beat.

[Haka]

Floyd went into retirement because of Margarito.

[Roadblock]

Floyd went into retirement because of Margarito.

Why dont you create a celebrity colouring book I reckon you would be good at it, call it connect any dots you like.

[hugh grant]

I don't think that's true.

He was champion for 6 years, in boxing's most historically rich weight class & defended the belt 7 times.

Very few people have done that.

I can't even refute you as I don't know what the champs have did in the 17 divisions and I'm not sure you do too.
But my guess is If a champ has stayed in one division their entire career, they will have wins over most in their weight class, just like spence has

[Haka]

Why dont you create a celebrity colouring book I reckon you would be good at it, call it connect any dots you like.

" Floyd will always be that boxer that fought Baldomir over Margarito for less money, then went into a 2 year retirement during physical prime when the WW was red hot. "

No matter how you are going to try to spin this but the statement above is factual and there is nothing you can ever do about it.