Comments Thread For: Chris Algieri's School of Thought: Terence Crawford can reclaim pound-for-pound glory from Oleksandr Usyk against Israil Madrimov
Collapse
-
-
It’s very debatable. One can make a very strong and compelling argument for Terence being the number one best pound for pound fighter in the world as well as Usyk and Inoue.
I will say Crawford has had the greater longevity of anyone currently ranked in the pound for pound list. However, what happens when Usyk defeats Fury in their rematch. It’s going to be very hard to make an argument against either one.Comment
-
This, however, is the lamest HW era in the history of the sport.
AND HW's can't move through divs searching for competent opposition.
If the div is dead or clownish, they can stack silly W's and be declared great.
Nelo has the best resume of all active fighters and there really isn't much an UNBIASED fight fan can say.
The rest -
Ok, Ok....Bud destroyed Spence.
Legit W but it's still only 1 W.
Prior to Spence......Shot Porter
Shakur
Inoue
Comment
-
Stop it pal, he is fighting a guy with a record of 10-0-1. Madrimov has 0 title fights. This is a cherry pick and straight money grab from Crawford.Comment
-
1) inoue no1. No acclimatising to division and goes straight to belt holders
2 ) usyk took 2 acclimatsing fights before fighting for belt.
3) bud took 5 years to fight spenceComment
-
Usyk by default (HW champ is thought to be the bees knees)
This, however, is the lamest HW era in the history of the sport.
AND HW's can't move through divs searching for competent opposition.
If the div is dead or clownish, they can stack silly W's and be declared great.
Nelo has the best resume of all active fighters and there really isn't much an UNBIASED fight fan can say.
The rest -
Ok, Ok....Bud destroyed Spence.
Legit W but it's still only 1 W.
Prior to Spence......Shot Porter
Shakur
InoueComment
Comment