Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Carl Froch and Anthony Joshua Resume Hostilities... Yet Again

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View Post

    All smart champions have rematch clauses you idiot. You'd be dumb to organize a fight without one - you'd lose your belts and not get a chance to fight for them again straight away..
    They're not your belts you fücking rëtard!!!

    Rematch clauses are a bane on boxing. The champs end up holding them to ransom for years while their duologies and trilogies get played out and sometimes in the courts

    Meanwhile contenders age out and get shopworn while pretenders are elevated in rankings then cherry picked to feed as legit opponents to reigning champs.

    Joshua played that game and it cost him his prime, his confidence and the chance to unify as undisputed while he was still undefeated.

    A dumb move that if you support makes you dumber than he is.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by pollywog View Post

      They're not your belts you fücking rëtard!!!

      Rematch clauses are a bane on boxing. The champs end up holding them to ransom for years while their duologies and trilogies get played out and sometimes in the courts

      Meanwhile contenders age out and get shopworn while pretenders are elevated in rankings then cherry picked to feed as legit opponents to reigning champs.

      Joshua played that game and it cost him his prime, his confidence and the chance to unify as undisputed while he was still undefeated.

      A dumb move that if you support makes you dumber than he is.
      You sound like a crazy person on a forum now.

      The whole of boxing is a bane on boxing. It's barely even a sport. You don't seem to realize there should be one world champion belt. Rematch clauses are the least of our worries.

      There are fighters who claim to be the greatest HW of the era while barely fighting anyone in the top-10

      But yes lets blame Joshua for using rematch clauses in his fights...

      Comment


      • #53
        [QUOTE=hennanra1000;n32307301]

        unless they are in Thailand, Philippines, Africa paying for young boys or girls right? How about the predominantly white priests, boy scout leaders, youth football coaches?

        And despite all this i would NOT say White people are rapists as am more enlightened than you and yet some of you are so ready to blame other races for all your demons and problems.


        Can't speak about the other places, but you might want to reevaluate at least part of your hypothesis.
        The top 10 nationalities visiting Thailand in April, 2023:

        1 Malaysia: 367,530 visitors
        2 China: 328,375 visitors
        3 India: 131,230 visitors
        4 Russia: 115,743 visitors
        5 South Korea: 95,229 visitors
        6 Vietnam: 84,221 visitors
        7 United States: 70,977 visitors
        8 United Kingdom: 70,089 visitors
        9 Laos: 68,204 visitors
        10 Hong Kong: 67,771 visitors

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View Post

          You sound like a crazy person on a forum now.

          The whole of boxing is a bane on boxing. It's barely even a sport. You don't seem to realize there should be one world champion belt. Rematch clauses are the least of our worries.

          There are fighters who claim to be the greatest HW of the era while barely fighting anyone in the top-10

          But yes lets blame Joshua for using rematch clauses in his fights...
          Fighters gonna talk shït to sell a fight. Ain't nothing new there.

          AJ having one way rematch clauses for every fight is a new thing that's suddenly become the norm with A-Side princess diva demands that aren't warranted.

          It cost him a shot at undisputed glory and backfired against Ruiz. His reputation never recovered from the quit job and run around in the rematch. Not to mention the meltdown against Usyk.

          The guy has ducked and weaved his way into mythical status based on a mostly fraudulent body of work against shot old men and bums with some home cooking added in against Parker.

          If the guy had even grown a pair and fought Hrgovic instead of performing in a crossover exhibition against an MMA guy he could even have been a 3 time trash belt holder by now.

          I hope Doobie smashes him to kingdom come and there's no rematch. That would be some bïtchy karma right there.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by pollywog View Post

            Fighters gonna talk shït to sell a fight. Ain't nothing new there.

            AJ having one way rematch clauses for every fight is a new thing that's suddenly become the norm with A-Side princess diva demands that aren't warranted.

            It cost him a shot at undisputed glory and backfired against Ruiz. His reputation never recovered from the quit job and run around in the rematch. Not to mention the meltdown against Usyk.

            The guy has ducked and weaved his way into mythical status based on a mostly fraudulent body of work against shot old men and bums with some home cooking added in against Parker.

            If the guy had even grown a pair and fought Hrgovic instead of performing in a crossover exhibition against an MMA guy he could even have been a 3 time trash belt holder by now.

            I hope Doobie smashes him to kingdom come and there's no rematch. That would be some bïtchy karma right there.
            I'm pretty sure one-way rematch clauses are normal between a champion and a challenger. Without them you would get champions who never fight anyone good. Because why take the risk when you can fight an easy guy instead?

            That seems like just you - no one cares about the 1st Ruiz fight anymore. They want Joshua Vs Fury. No so long ago the "worse thing that ever happened in boxing" was when Joshua threw a tantrum after the 2nd Usyk fight. Before that it was "Joshua not being himself". Seems like this Joshua guy is really bringing this noble and pure sport down. Literally every bad incident in boxing involves Joshua.

            Joshau was told to fight Ngannou by the Saudis for a route to the belts... Let's not forget Ngannou had just knocked Fury down and came close to beating him, and that was his first ever boxing match. Where is the Fury/Ngannou rematch???

            Dubois could beat Joshua. That's why i like AJ. He actually takes hard fights. I do think AJ wins though, he is a better boxer and Dubois's chin isn't amazing.
            Last edited by Roberto Vasquez; 07-17-2024, 06:01 AM.

            Comment


            • #56
              Josh lost to a fat mexican. But that Mexican is good. Josh lost badly but shouldn't define josh. As it's how you bounce back.
              But DDD v josh will be competitive, one is more likely to win than the other, but both can win
              Last edited by hugh grant; 07-17-2024, 05:48 AM.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View Post

                I'm pretty sure one-way rematch clauses are normal between a champion and a challenger. Without them you would get champions who never fight anyone good. Because why take the risk when you can fight an easy guy instead?

                That seems like just you - no one cares about the 1st Ruiz fight anymore. They want Joshua Vs Fury. No so long ago the "worse thing that ever happened in boxing" was when Joshua threw a tantrum after the 2nd Usyk fight. Before that it was "Joshua not being himself". Seems like this Joshua guy is really bringing this noble and pure sport down. Literally every bad incident in boxing involves Joshua.

                Joshau was told to fight Ngannou by the Saudis for a route to the belts... Let's not forget Ngannou had just knocked Fury down and came close to beating him, and that was his first ever boxing match. Where is the Fury/Ngannou rematch???

                Dubois could beat Joshua. That's why i like AJ. He actually takes hard fights. I do think AJ wins though, he is a better boxer and Dubois's chin isn't amazing.
                What a load of horseshït. Oneway rematch clauses are a Fast Eddie special to ensure his fragile Princess gets 2 bites at the cherry.

                Joshy can pick n choose who he wants to fight. The Desert Turki said as much. He chose a novice MMA guy to splatter rather than any legit top 10 contender. Sauds can't dictate any routes to any belts.

                And i'd contend people care more about Ruiz 1 than a shot Fury vs an insecure AJ in a battle of Usyk's sloppy seconds, but i can only speak for myself.

                Perhaps you'd be best served doing the same.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by pollywog View Post

                  What a load of horseshït. Oneway rematch clauses are a Fast Eddie special to ensure his fragile Princess gets 2 bites at the cherry.

                  Joshy can pick n choose who he wants to fight. The Desert Turki said as much. He chose a novice MMA guy to splatter rather than any legit top 10 contender. Sauds can't dictate any routes to any belts.

                  And i'd contend people care more about Ruiz 1 than a shot Fury vs an insecure AJ in a battle of Usyk's sloppy seconds, but i can only speak for myself.

                  Perhaps you'd be best served doing the same.
                  So what you are saying no other promoter negotiates one-way rematch clauses? That no one had thought of that before in all of boxing corrupt history??

                  I just remember Fury offering Usyk and AJ unfair splits on Twitter so they wouldn't take the fight but when they did - he had to back out quickly. If I remember correct Uysk was given a 30/70 split (which he accepted). Seems you would rather this nonsense - than fights actually happening

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Boro View Post

                    Nope, White people actually commit crimes close to their representation if not in parity with their demographic except for drinking offenses.

                    Other races don't, they over-present massively in all categories including the one he's talking about in fact ironically the worst offenders of this particular crime in all of Britain unsurprisingly are "Asians" and we're not talking about East Asians obviously and Somalians share the same belief system as the "Asians" as does increasingly more of Africa as they spread their BS by the sword.

                    Didn’t read this pal, but please stay away from schools

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by P to the J View Post


                      Didn’t read this pal, but please stay away from schools
                      Cute lil ret@rd doesn't like facts, so you act like you didn't read it bless ya.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP