The IBF is probably the one belt you can get without needing a big promoter behind you.
Comments Thread For: Oleksandr Usyk Vacates IBF Title Ahead of Joshua-Dubois Announcement
Collapse
-
You guys will complain when fighters keep on remaining and now complain when IBF say that the champion should honour his mandatory obligation or vacate their belt. It's Usyk's choice to vacate. Usyk and Tipsy King knew beforehand about the rules before agreeing an immediate rematch. Rules should be respected. Usyk remains the last undisputed till someone else archieves the same.
Besides, an undisputed championship is not forever.Comment
-
Comment
-
You should look up what the word corruption meaning. Upholding the rules has certainly nothing to do with corruption, rather it stands for integrity. Some of folks are fking sentimental.Comment
-
IBF is the only sanctioning body with integrity. Guys like you are truly confused and fickle
You guys will complain when fighters keep on remaining and now complain when IBF say that the champion should honour his mandatory obligation or vacate their belt. It's Usyk's choice to vacate. Usyk and Tipsy King knew beforehand about the rules before agreeing an immediate rematch. Rules should be respected. Usyk remains the last undisputed till someone else archieves the same.
Besides, an undisputed championship is not forever.
The idea behind crowning a champion is recognizing the best. Not filling a vacancy, not soaking up sanctioning fees, not rewarding the fighters that have jumped through your arbitrary hoops. If you came up with a set of rules that says you have to take a belt from a guy that everybody knows is the best fighter to give it to someone he already beat, you have absolutely failed the sport in every aspect.
Integrity? If the IBF had integrity they'd dissolve tomorrow. Same goes for the IBO, WBA, WBC, and WBO.Comment
-
Comment
-
Their mandatory obligation is a fight between a guy he knocked out on a jab and a guy he beat twice over 24 rounds. Their rules have failed to produce a worthy mandatory challenger and they should just shut down the entire organization as a result. If their rules say the smart thing to do is to take a belt from a guy to give it to the winner of a fight between two dudes he beat a total of three times in recent memory, the organization on the whole has no reason to exist anymore.
The idea behind crowning a champion is recognizing the best. Not filling a vacancy, not soaking up sanctioning fees, not rewarding the fighters that have jumped through your arbitrary hoops. If you came up with a set of rules that says you have to take a belt from a guy that everybody knows is the best fighter to give it to someone he already beat, you have absolutely failed the sport in every aspect.
Integrity? If the IBF had integrity they'd dissolve tomorrow. Same goes for the IBO, WBA, WBC, and WBO.
I mean, it is hilarious that Joshua and Dubois somehow swam back to the top of the queue, but there has to be at least like 1 out of the 4 sanctioning bodies to live be its own standards.
I think the real issue is how those two got ahead of all the other talented fighters working their way up the ranks.Comment
-
It sounds like your beef is with who's getting the opportunity more so than the IBF enforcing it's rules..
I mean, it is hilarious that Joshua and Dubois somehow swam back to the top of the queue, but there has to be at least like 1 out of the 4 sanctioning bodies to live be its own standards.
I think the real issue is how those two got ahead of all the other talented fighters working their way up the ranks.
It's a systemic failure and it shows that they don't bring any value to the sport of boxing. They should fold. The WBA, WBC, WBO, and IBO should fold too.Comment
-
The fighters need to have a moratorium on sanctioning bodies and ALL refuse to pay the fee moving forward. We need to get rid of them and go back to one champion. Imagine having four super bowls or four MLB Finals. It's just so asinine having multiple champions especially when they pull **** like this.Comment
Comment