Comments Thread For: Is Adrien Broner The Worst Four Division Champion Of All Time?

[low blows]

Duke was a 3 weight champion. A fighter who beat a world class fighter in each division. He's like a god compared to Broner who has pretty much nothing at any weight.

Ha!

You're right he won 3 titles and fought for a 4th title so Broner's accomplishments weight division wise trumps that, so he is the worst 4 weight division champion ever. I suppose somebody has to be the worst of the best....

[hugh grant]

Broner promised so much, but delivered very little

[Sid-Knee]

Ha!

You're right he won 3 titles and fought for a 4th title so Broner's accomplishments weight division wise *****s that, so he is the worst 4 weight division champion ever. I suppose somebody has to be the worst of the best....

Even with Duke having titles in 3 weights, it's still better to beat world class fighters in 3 than to not beat any in 4 weights. Duke was a much better fighter.

Accomplishments for me are all about who you beat and when you beat them. I don't care for phony titles against scrubs. I don't consider them to be an accomplishment. Loads of fighters could have beaten scrubs in a load of weight classes. But they didn't see any worth in it.