Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Serrano To Taylor: 'Deep Down, I Know I Won The Fight'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Deep down Katie Taylor knows you beat her fair, and square. So do some of her fan's, and most if not all of your fan's, she knows what you did to her.
    She's just going along with the corrupt judges who scored the fight for her, her corner, promoter, and the rest of those who are lying to her.
    Serrano just go out there on 7/20/2024, and put on the best performance of your heralded career, and you'll come out victorious as you always do.

    Comment


    • #12
      Serrano do a Subriel Matias on her, make Katie Taylor quit in her corner!

      Comment


      • #13
        Amanda should have finished her in Round 5 when she had her badly wobbled. With a better corner, she would have stopped Katie. I still had Serrano winning a clear decision.
        Boricua181 Boricua181 likes this.

        Comment


        • #14
          I thought Serrano nab the victory in the last round. It was a good fight and and good event and I don't consider it a robbery or a controversial fight. It was just that close.

          Comment


          • #15
            Had Serrano had a real trainer and not that ****** Maldonado in her corner, she would have stopped Katie in round 5.

            The big difference in this fight is that the main promoter is JP MVP and not Eddie Hearn. So if the fight goes the distance, Hearn can’t help Katie this time like he did in the first fight with Amanda and the two Cameron fights which Katie lost.

            BTW, what’s up with the WBC and WBA allowing Katie to hold belts at two different weights? Isn’t there a rule that in that case the fighter has a couple of weeks to decide which belts they will keep between the two? Gotta love these corrupt sanctioning bodies who put sanctioning fees above their BS rules. Amanda, don’t take your foot off the gas when you hurt Katie again like round 5 . Remember, Eddie Hearn can’t save Katie this time around.

            Last, I don’t think Katie is showing signs of being punch drunk. Yes, she has been getting pounded with some big shots. I just think she speaks like if she has a tampon in her mouth. I don’t understand a Fooking word she says. Besides, Katie has less of a personality than a mosquito, and Amanda speaks like a country hick from Porto Rico. No need for a trilogy, Katie needs to quit before she can impersonate Rid**** Bowe. Amanda by TKO if she uses the hair dye after the fight.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Boricua181 View Post

              Exactly!, except that their fight was for 2 minutes, not 3 minutes, if it had been scheduled for 3 minutes in their first fight, Taylor probably wouldn't have lasted the round.
              I had Serrano winning that fight, and it wasn't a close fight unless you were giving Taylor point's for catching punches on her face.
              After the final bell rang Taylor's face was a mess, and she was out of it, her corner was surprised, and elated that she was announced the winner.
              Because Serrano apparently has to beat Taylor every second of every round in order to win if it goes to the score cards.
              I hope that Serrano trains up in the mountains, so that she'll be able to do just that if it's necessary to (beat her from start to finish).
              More importantly Taylor is becoming less understandable when she speaks, and it isn't due to her Irish brogue.
              It's due to her catching so many punches on her head, so she shouldn't be bragging about having taken Serrano's best punches.
              Those punches have lingering effects on a boxer, and Taylor has had some brutal fights with Persoon twice, Cameron twice, Jonas once, now she's going for another.
              I respect Katie Taylor's, grit, and determination, but this is Serrano's biggest moment to shine in front of the boxing world, and she won't be denied.
              Yeah, two minutes. In one fight, a fighter can get a flash knockdown, even though he was being outboxed to that point and be awarded 2 points - and then in another fight a fighter beats the crap out of a fighter from pillar to post and get a single point. What a fked up system. Yeah, pulling for Serrano and hope she gets a fair scoring.
              Last edited by richardt; 05-17-2024, 06:05 PM.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                I was cheering for Serrano but she lost that fight, let it get away from her after the knockdown.
                .
                There was no knock down in that fight

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by richardt View Post

                  Problem I have is when one fighter beats the sht out of another fighter for 3 minutes and has them in huge trouble, THAT should be scored a two-point round which can make a difference on the scorecards. A one-point round for that kind of round is ridiculous for that kind of trouncing that took place.
                  I agree but you can look at it another way and think that if there's no knockdown then where's the line where it becomes a 10-9 round to a 10-8 round? it becomes very subjective, whereas a Knockdown is irrefutable

                  judges are bad enough now just trying to get simple scoring correct, so if you start putting in more 10-8 rounds for a dominated round without a knockdown, then the judges will abuse that by giving 10-8 rounds to A-sides when maybe it shouldn't be.

                  So if more subjective 10-8 rounds were scored, I actually think it would become a tool to rob fighters more than get the correct cards.
                  Last edited by deathofaclown; 05-17-2024, 07:15 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post

                    I agree but you can look at it another way and think that if there's no knockdown then where's the line where it becomes a 10-9 round to a 10-8 round? it becomes very subjective, whereas a Knockdown is irrefutable

                    judges are bad enough now just trying to get simple scoring correct, so if you start putting in more 10-8 rounds for a dominated round without a knockdown, then the judges will abuse that by giving 10-8 rounds to A-sides when maybe it shouldn't be.

                    So if more subjective 10-8 rounds were scored, I actually think it would become a tool to rob fighters more than get the correct cards.
                    No, what I'm saying if a fighter scores a flash knockdown but was clearly outboxed up to that point and then after, that is not a genuine 10-8 round in his favor and I've seen that happen enough.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by BlackRobb View Post
                      Amanda should have finished her in Round 5 when she had her badly wobbled. With a better corner, she would have stopped Katie. I still had Serrano winning a clear decision.
                      Exactly! I'm looking for the Baymon born, Brooklyn raised Puerto Rican superstar to beat Taylor even more convincingly than in their first fight.
                      BlackRobb BlackRobb likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP