Originally posted by Oregonian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Jaron Ennis Says He Is 'Most Definitely' Crawford's Toughest Opponent
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by El_Mero View Post
Yiu can hate all you want. I'll beleive analysts, coaches and former pros over some anonymous youngster
But you won’t believe the same analysts, coaches and former pros who say Boots is the most talented boxer they’ve seen AND the most dangerous opponent for Bud?
Comment
-
Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
Nice sound bite but Crawford isn't 26 he's 36 and he beat Errol Spence. Errol would easily beat every guy Ennis fought and do it on the same night and still not make as much as he did fighting Crawford....so what's you point?
My point is pretty simple AND I was responding to the person that said Boots has fought no one.
So I simply analyzed Crawford and Boots resume at 26 and asked a simple question - Was Bud’s resume better at 26?
Since you bring up money, how much money did Crawford make fighting Kavaliauskas or Avanesyan?
Fighting Madrinov who is 10-0 and virtually unknown to the boxing community is a joke.
It is no different than Canelo fighting Ryder or Munguia instead of Benavidez. We all know why he’s doing it.Last edited by Oregonian; 04-27-2024, 10:13 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———
But you won’t believe the same analysts, coaches and former pros who say Boots is the most talented boxer they’ve seen AND the most dangerous opponent for Bud?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post——-
Who is the toughest opponent Crawgord fought when he was 26?
Andrei Klimov, Alejandro Sanabria and Breidis Prescott. These guys are so much better than the guys Boots fought at 26, is that it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ropeydope View PostThis headline could be correct but how can we know since Ennis hasn’t fought anybody. Easy to criticize a multi-weight unified world champion’s resume when you’re on the outside looking in. Sounds like half the armchair warriors on this app. Try defending your paper title. Maybe that will give it some credibility.
It’s also easy to criticize a pro boxer who is 31-0 like the armchair warriors on this app. Try lacing up gloves and be a pro boxer. Maybe it will give it some credibility. Your own words, verbatim.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
The age argument is always used by morons. B-Hop must’ve been a terrible fighter by that reta**ed logic.
Not sure if You are disagreeing with BUT you are literally making my point for me.
The idiots that keep saying Boots has achieved nothing at 26 and at 31-0.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El_Mero View Post
Make history in another division while attempting to become a 3 division undisputed OR fight a guy who was emailed your old belt & turned down an offer 2 years....choice is pretty clear. If Bootsy wants the fight, go fight Murta at 154, win and Bud is right there. Bootsy/Murta is leagues better than Bootsy/Crowley anyway
I am literally using your own logic
Originally posted by El_Mero View Post
Yiu can hate all you want. I'll beleive analysts, coaches and former pros over some anonymous youngster
When the same logic is applied here, you shift to whole new argument and refute your own logic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———
Not sure if You are disagreeing with BUT you are literally making my point for me.
The idiots that keep saying Boots has achieved nothing at 26 and at 31-0.
Comparing them at the age of “x” is irrelevant nonsense. Adrian Broner was a 3 division world champion at 23, meanwhile, Bernard Hopkins was 0-0 and probably hadn’t even wore a pair of boxing gloves.
Comment
Comment