I have seen fury-nganou at least 5 times. Ngannou won 3 rounds. That's it. No argument. How on earth did one judge see him as winning that fight? He had three effective punches landed in an entire fight, one of which floored fury.
Ngannous boxing was such and such. A bit off balance, great speed, but very low activity from both sides.
He was actually better against Joshua. Much stronger base, never off balance. But he simply doesn't have the reflexes for that sport against a puncher like Joshua
Ngannous boxing was such and such. A bit off balance, great speed, but very low activity from both sides.
He was actually better against Joshua. Much stronger base, never off balance. But he simply doesn't have the reflexes for that sport against a puncher like Joshua