Hopkins is the most boring top level fighter I have ever seen, he fights like John Ruiz. He has NEVER had an impressive KO win...and don't try to bring up the Oscar KO, that was the weakest lamest KO I have ever seen, it looked like Oscar took a dive. Hopkins is a boring, dirty, ugly, clinch-happy decision boxer.
PS: Hopkins/Winky was the worst fight of all time.
If you can respect what Vitali did to Chris Arreola, you should be able to respect what an Old Hopkins did to a young Champion fighter like Pavlik.
Hopkins has been boring for a while but he wasn't always boring. Go Pre-Tito, although the Daniels fight was a good fight based on his display of ability...and maybe even his fight with Joppy...but Pre-Tito Hopkins was good to watch. Hopkins-Echols fights are still enjoyable to watch as well as many others.
And Hopkins has had impressive KO's.
Here is a quicky
And you can always go watch some HL videos if you are to lazy to watch his full career.
i believe i got bored after the 7th or 8th round after arreola tried to desperately turn the tables and failed. after that i knew he couldn't do anything anymore to get close to vitali. he was too far behind on the cards so it was useless for the fight to continue. overall the fight was decent but not great.
Vitali was throwing and landing every punch in the book....combinations, hard jabs, big right hands, uppercuts, body shots, left hooks, right hooks, straight rights, righ hand leads, punches from all angles...he showed great footwork for a big man, excellent ring generalship, great counter punching, etc.
Props to Arreola, he showed a great chin and big heart.
It was a flawless dominant brilliant performance by the great Vitali Klitschko!
So, just out of curiosity, if you loved this domination why don't you love Mayweather's fights? He does the same type of thing for the whole fight except he's technically much better than Klitschko.
Like the Hatton fight? Why didn't you like that fight? He knocked him out at the end and it was more exciting than a Klitschko fight in that it actually looked like a fight for a while?
I'm being serious. Not trying to start an argument.
So, just out of curiosity, if you loved this domination why don't you love Mayweather's fights? He does the same type of thing for the whole fight except he's technically much better than Klitschko.
Like the Hatton fight? Why didn't you like that fight? He knocked him out at the end and it was more exciting than a Klitschko fight in that it actually looked like a fight for a while?
I'm being serious. Not trying to start an argument.
Why did you enjoy the Mayweather dominations and not Vitalis? Mayweather rarely stops his opponents, Vitali almost always does. So he's even more dominant than Floyd.
The undefeated Mayweather fought an older man from a smaller weight division who had previously lost several decisions. Vitali fought a younger, undefeated boxer who weighed the same as himself.
Comment