Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Nicolson Tells Serrano To Fight Or Vacate The Belts After Vegas Victory

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    That's why Serrano dropped the WBC title. She wanted fights to be 12 3 minute rounds but the WBC said no. That's the excuse she used to duck Skye. Skye is willing to fight over any length Serrano feels comfortable. But she won't fight her. Serrano knows she'll be outclassed.
    Serrano didn't drop the belt because of this chick that can't bust a g****. Get out of here with that b.s. that you just repeated after hearing Nicholson say it. It's well known that she dropped the WBC belt because they wouldn't sanction three minute rounds and twelve round fights for women. That's the facts. Amanda probably doesn't even know who this "Sally come lately" even is. Much less would she have any reason to duck her, get real.

    ​​​
    Last edited by CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart; 04-07-2024, 04:36 PM.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post

      I don't see what dropping the WBC belt and showing them that she doesn't need them has to do with ducking anyone, this Skye has 10 fights hard to duck someone so new who has only been a pro 2 years.
      Serrano knows Skye has an awkward style where she won't get close to her. She'll be picked off coming in.

      But as soon as Skye moved towards the mandatory spot, i knew Serrano would drop whichever title Skye became mandatory to. Serrano didn't disappoint me. She's predictable. Hell, it took her years to get into the ring with Taylor after mouthing off about wanting it for years. She prefers to fight complete turkey's who won't challenge her. Serrano's whole career is filled with therm.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by pnut901 View Post

        Serrano didn't drop the belt because of this chick that can't bust a g****. Get out of here with that b.s. that you just repeated after hearing Nicholson say it. It's well known that she dropped the WBC belt because they wouldn't sanction three minute rounds and twelve round fights for women. That's the facts. Amanda probably doesn't even know who this "Sally come lately" even is. Much less would she have any reason to duck her, get real.

        ​​​
        I predicted Serrano would do it well before the mandatory being called.

        Trust me, she knows who Skye is. Serrano isn't going anywhere near her. She'll be given a big offer for the fight. But watch what happens.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

          Serrano knows Skye has an awkward style where she won't get close to her. She'll be picked off coming in.

          But as soon as Skye moved towards the mandatory spot, i knew Serrano would drop whichever title Skye became mandatory to. Serrano didn't disappoint me. She's predictable. Hell, it took her years to get into the ring with Taylor after mouthing off about wanting it for years. She prefers to fight complete turkey's who won't challenge her. Serrano's whole career is filled with therm.
          I have no idea what about pillowfisted Skye makes you believe that, as far as the Taylor fight, it was a bad decision and the result of it made her decide to only do 12 X 3 since Taylor games the system holding as much as possible to run out the clock.

          Serrano has just shy a 50 fights and for a woman her size is a good puncher, she isn't ducking some rookie e-mail champion.

          Comment


          • #15
            The notion that Serrano is ducking anyone is ******. She's fighting for women's equality in boxing. Whether you agree or disagree with her stance, she's amply proven that she takes on all comers, and has for years. She's one of the greats on the women's side.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post

              I have no idea what about pillowfisted Skye makes you believe that, as far as the Taylor fight, it was a bad decision and the result of it made her decide to only do 12 X 3 since Taylor games the system holding as much as possible to run out the clock.

              Serrano has just shy a 50 fights and for a woman her size is a good puncher, she isn't ducking some rookie e-mail champion.
              Why would Skye need power when her style will give the slow footed Serrano a boxing lesson by keeping her on the outside?

              Serrano clearly lost to Taylor too. You don't judge someone by how tired they are. If they're landing more punches, which Taylor did, then she gets the rounds. It's a pretty easy fight to score too. Why, which rounds did you give to Serrano?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07 View Post
                The notion that Serrano is ducking anyone is ******. She's fighting for women's equality in boxing. Whether you agree or disagree with her stance, she's amply proven that she takes on all comers, and has for years. She's one of the greats on the women's side.
                It took her years to get in there with Taylor. This after mouthing off about her and supposedly wanting to face her. She was just using her name to sell as she couldn't draw curtains until Taylor came along. Now she's got another challenge and not another faceless nobody, and she's dropped the title and done a runner. Please don't pretend you know her opposition.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                  Why would Skye need power when her style will give the slow footed Serrano a boxing lesson by keeping her on the outside?

                  Serrano clearly lost to Taylor too. You don't judge someone by how tired they are. If they're landing more punches, which Taylor did, then she gets the rounds. It's a pretty easy fight to score too. Why, which rounds did you give to Serrano?
                  You're rating Skye against the limited opposition she has fought, she looks pretty good but largely unproven.

                  I'd have to watch it again, I just recall thinking Serrano should have won and Taylor was very fortunate to leave on her feet but no you're wrong go read the judging criteria on the ABC website, effectiveness of punches is the primary determination over number of punches as to who is winning the rds. I don't make up my own rules like "busier" or "coming forward" like many posters do.
                  real raw real raw likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post

                    You're rating Skye against the limited opposition she has fought, she looks pretty good but largely unproven.

                    I'd have to watch it again, I just recall thinking Serrano should have won and Taylor was very fortunate to leave on her feet but no you're wrong go read the judging criteria on the ABC website, effectiveness of punches is the primary determination over number of punches as to who is winning the rds. I don't make up my own rules like "busier" or "coming forward" like many posters do.
                    How many rounds can you say Serrano had the most effective punches? She rocked Taylor was it once or twice? But no more than that. Taylor was just too active for Serrano to get the decision. She was tired and a bit floppy. But she was still landing pretty much all the shots.

                    Skye's opponents are pretty damn awful if i'm being honest. Same with Serrano's. But style wise, Serrano wants nothing to do with her. Just keep your eye out because Skye will get Eddie to make an offer. Serrano will not take it. Well, unless it's a ridiculous amount way beyond the market value. She'll price herself out big time.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                      It took her years to get in there with Taylor. This after mouthing off about her and supposedly wanting to face her. She was just using her name to sell as she couldn't draw curtains until Taylor came along. Now she's got another challenge and not another faceless nobody, and she's dropped the title and done a runner. Please don't pretend you know her opposition.
                      I see you're back to proving yourself one of worst posters on here.

                      Serrano fought the likes of Heather Hardy twice, Daniela Bermudez, who has been ranked on the women's P4P list, and gave the same Mahfoud who just lost to Skye her first loss, en route to becoming undisputed. She dropped the title because WBC refused to allow her to do 3 min rounds. That's well documented.

                      https://www.ringtv.com/661983-amanda...-min-campaign/

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP