A Brain Buster for all boxing fans

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43424
    • 4,539
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #1

    A Brain Buster for all boxing fans

    i have a "hypothetical" for all boxing fans and especially for all "business boxing fans"

    Ok i have 2 fighters. Fighter A has generated 3.65 million ppv buys over his last 3 fights. Fighter B has generated 3.89 million ppv buys over his last 3 fights.

    what should the split be?
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43424
    • 4,539
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #2
    i personally feel fighter B only deserves a flat fee which would amount to 10 percent or less of the actual split. im a reasonable person here!

    Comment

    • Roadblock
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 14031
      • 3,535
      • 428
      • 108,713

      #3
      Its not the only criteria, who holds the titles, were their last PPVS generated because of them or their opponent, wins and losses, weight classes etc etc.

      On face value, it's close to 50/50, but add in the other parts, and it can be a significant difference.

      Comment

      • daggum
        All time great
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 43424
        • 4,539
        • 3
        • 166,270

        #4
        Originally posted by Roadblock
        Its not the only criteria, who holds the titles, were their last PPVS generated because of them or their opponent, wins and losses, weight classes etc etc.

        On face value, it's close to 50/50, but add in the other parts, and it can be a significant difference.
        well both guys took the lions share of the purses from their last 3 ppvs so lets just say it was generated mostly because of them. i dont see how wins and losses factor into ppv split negotiations? oscar lost plenty of times but he still got the lions share. no one cares about titles. baldomir had the titles and got nothing.

        Comment

        • Roadblock
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2006
          • 14031
          • 3,535
          • 428
          • 108,713

          #5
          Originally posted by daggum

          well both guys took the lions share of the purses from their last 3 ppvs so lets just say it was generated mostly because of them. i dont see how wins and losses factor into ppv split negotiations? oscar lost plenty of times but he still got the lions share. no one cares about titles. baldomir had the titles and got nothing.
          It all factors in which is what Lawyers, Promoters and Managers haggle out a split over, all the factors.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48435
            • 4,795
            • 267
            • 104,043

            #6
            Why are you narrowing it down to 3 fights because it suits your argenda?

            Also, one of those you're referring to (Pacquaio-Mosley) were never officially released by Showtime (I think it was who televised it) so it's a moot point from there.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 48435
              • 4,795
              • 267
              • 104,043

              #7
              Originally posted by daggum

              well both guys took the lions share of the purses from their last 3 ppvs so lets just say it was generated mostly because of them. i dont see how wins and losses factor into ppv split negotiations? oscar lost plenty of times but he still got the lions share. no one cares about titles. baldomir had the titles and got nothing.
              Great win though, right? Since he was ranked #1.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43424
                • 4,539
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #8
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                Why are you narrowing it down to 3 fights because it suits your argenda?

                Also, one of those you're referring to (Pacquaio-Mosley) were never officially released by Showtime (I think it was who televised it) so it's a moot point from there.
                im narrowing it down because recent fights should hold more weight but HEY LETS DO IT FOR ALL THEIR PPV FIGHTS SHALL WE?

                narrow it down to 1 fight. pac. 2 fights pac. 3 fights pac. 4 fights pac. 5 fights floyd. 6 fights floyd. 7 figths pac. 8 fights pac.

                Comment

                • daggum
                  All time great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 43424
                  • 4,539
                  • 3
                  • 166,270

                  #9
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                  Great win though, right? Since he was ranked #1.
                  yeah its weird when marg, cotto, and pac were #1 he didnt fight them...when baldomir was #1 he did. if baldomir was the only guy in his division then hey what more can you ask for? cept that wasnt the case now was it?

                  Comment

                  • daggum
                    All time great
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 43424
                    • 4,539
                    • 3
                    • 166,270

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Roadblock

                    It all factors in which is what Lawyers, Promoters and Managers haggle out a split over, all the factors.
                    cool story. i just disproved everything that you said. you didnt rebut anything i said. you simply restated your original wrong statement. i wonder if you even know you cant argue worth a damn? maybe in your head you think you are doing good? who knows. must be a coping mechanism

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP