Tweet
By Cliff Rold - For any new boxing fan, the time is not long before a fellow fan points out a magic number which grows more mythologized with time: eight. As in boxing’s original eight weight classes. The number represents in the mind of many a time when the sport was compressed into fields which couldn’t help but be talented, couldn’t help but draw crowds, because there were so few places on the scale to go. They were divisions marked by single champions ever challenged by a depth of contenders today’s seventeen weight classes rarely know. [details]
-
-
Atleast JLC is ranked better then SSM and rightfully so. Shane ain't do **** at 135. -
Duran should be no1.Comment
-
It would be good if Cliff could present the quantitative data as well as the qualitative to give the exact reasoning of the respective rankings of the fighters. The article gives none such info so the exact 'sceince' to warrant the rankings are not clear.
Instead we are just presented with some descriptive facts to present the fighters. That's also interesting, but since we know that some work has been done to compile the list in regards to mathematics and gauging of eras it's somewhat dissapointing that those facts remain in the dark.Comment
-
I see your point...but that's discussed somewhat at the bottom. If you want a methodology white paper I can gin it up but I don't think anyone else would read it.
Here's an example of stratification: Jimmy Carter scores extremely high at Lightweight and easily makes it into the first cut of 50. BUT no one can be sure how many of his fights were on the up and up...so he gets cut. This is essentially the same thing as the Jr. classes, and mostly follows scoring results.Last edited by crold1; 10-10-2009, 01:38 PM.Comment
-
You know I love you Cliff, but there is no rational for rating JLC higher than Mosley at 135.Comment
-
Most of his fights were actually filmed although they are fairly rare. I'd say the fights he won were all legit.I see your point...but that's discussed somewhat at the bottom. If you want a methodology white paper I can gin it up but I don't think anyone else would read it.
Here's an example of stratification: Jimmy Carter scores extremely high at Lightweight and easily makes it into the first cut of 50. BUT no one can be sure how many of his fights were on the up and up...so he gets cut. This is essentially the same thing as the Jr. classes, and mostly follows scoring results.
Great fighter in my opinion.
Pleasantly surprised to see Willie Ritchie get a spot in the top 25. Not a boxer who gets mentioned too often.Comment
-
I think based on each man's best wins, and what should have been a win over Mayweather for Castillo IMO, Mosley doesn't sniff Castillo at Lightweight. I prefer, while respecting both, body of work over percieved talent advantage and on those terms, it would be irrational to have Mosley over Castillo. The only way to get there is giving Mosley credit for achievement in other classes. Mosley still made the cut because he did look THAT good against occasionally above average opp.Comment
Comment