Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez To Make "Important Announcements About His Career" This Tuesday On TV Azteca

[garfios]

You keep on using worthless stats and opinions from others to deflect away. I'm not. I'm using cold hard facts and evidence that proves how worthless their opinions and stats are. The fact you think a corrupt promotional company like TopRank can have corrupt refs and judges but not the people doing the stats is hilarious. Stop being dishonest and deflecting away with your fallacies. Show me where Ramirez lands punches outside of the times i wrote down in round 1? Trying to get rid of me by saying "I'm not wasting my time" even though you've wasted time by deflecting as much as you have done. But when it comes time to prove Ramirez won, you can't do it. You shut it down completely and run to these pathetic fallacies that prove absolutely nothing. That's why you're dishonest. You know for a fact you can't prove Ramirez won because it was in fact a robbery. Dogboe called it on the night and was right. It was a robbery. The facts are right there in front of you. I've done the work for you but you're still desperately trying to get out of it. You're as pathetic as Canelo and his fans. You're behaving just like them.

Do you even know how to get on YouTube and press play? What seems to be the problem here? Don't come back with any more fallacies. I'm asking you to go direct to the source. You know, the actual evidence with the video of the fight?

Did you watch what I posted? Did you find another accolade?

[Sid-Knee]

Did you watch what I posted? Did you find another accolade?

Yes, i saw what you posted. It was another deflection just like this one.

Those stats are factually false. The evidence is on video. But you're doing everything to shut this down. If you can support those false stats, why don't you get to it and show me punches that Ramirez landed in the first round other than the times i wrote down?

Now come back with another dishonest deflection and strawman.

Learn what a strawman argument is. You're coming out with them thick and fast like they're going out of fashion. While you're there, learn what hypocrisy is. You accuse Canelo and his fans of being the very thing you are. But because it benefits you, you're happy to accept it. Just like it benefits them so they'll accept it. It doesn't matter how degrading or dishonest it is. They don't care. The same way you don't care. I'm actually embarrassed for you and how pathetic this is. The saddest of all though, aren't you in your 60's or something?

[garfios]

Yes, i saw what you posted. It was another deflection just like this one.

Those stats are factually false. The evidence is on video. But you're doing everything to shut this down. If you can support those false stats, why don't you get to it and show me punches that Ramirez landed in the first round other than the times i wrote down?

Now come back with another dishonest deflection and strawman.

Learn what a strawman argument is. You're coming out with them thick and fast like they're going out of fashion. While you're there, learn what hypocrisy is. You accuse Canelo and his fans of being the very thing you are. But because it benefits you, you're happy to accept it. Just like it benefits them so they'll accept it. It doesn't matter how degrading or dishonest it is. They don't care. The same way you don't care. I'm actually embarrassed for you and how pathetic this is. The saddest of all though, aren't you in your 60's or something?

I sent you a video.

[Sid-Knee]

I sent you a video.

You sent me a TopRank highlight video that is made to look like Ramirez won. How is that showing every punch in the first round? It's clearly manipulation. And it's cowardice from you. You know you can't justify Ramirez out-landing Dogboe so you're being pathetic and deflecting all over the place.

[garfios]

You sent me a TopRank highlight video that is made to look like Ramirez won. How is that showing every punch in the first round? It's clearly manipulation. And it's cowardice from you. You know you can't justify Ramirez out-landing Dogboe so you're being pathetic and deflecting all over the place.

According to CompuBox, Ramirez landed 160 of 495 punches (32 percent) and Dogboe landed 113 of 619 (18 percent). Ramirez outlanded him in every round except for the third (9-8).Apr 2, 2023

[garfios]

You keep on using worthless stats and opinions from others to deflect away. I'm not. I'm using cold hard facts and evidence that proves how worthless their opinions and stats are. The fact you think a corrupt promotional company like TopRank can have corrupt refs and judges but not the people doing the stats is hilarious. Stop being dishonest and deflecting away with your fallacies. Show me where Ramirez lands punches outside of the times i wrote down in round 1? Trying to get rid of me by saying "I'm not wasting my time" even though you've wasted time by deflecting as much as you have done. But when it comes time to prove Ramirez won, you can't do it. You shut it down completely and run to these pathetic fallacies that prove absolutely nothing. That's why you're dishonest. You know for a fact you can't prove Ramirez won because it was in fact a robbery. Dogboe called it on the night and was right. It was a robbery. The facts are right there in front of you. I've done the work for you but you're still desperately trying to get out of it. You're as pathetic as Canelo and his fans. You're behaving just like them.

Do you even know how to get on YouTube and press play? What seems to be the problem here? Don't come back with any more fallacies. I'm asking you to go direct to the source. You know, the actual evidence with the video of the fight?

I can prove Ramirez won because he outclassed dogboe, there's no evidence, not even the slightly, tha he was robbed. And you stand alone in that belief.

[Sid-Knee]

According to CompuBox, Ramirez landed 160 of 495 punches (32 percent) and Dogboe landed 113 of 619 (18 percent). Ramirez outlanded him in every round except for the third (9-8).Apr 2, 2023

Are you as ****** as your comments make out? Or are you just playing ******?

If you think Arum can have corrupt refs and judges but not the guys who press buttons on compubox to convince people Arum's favourite won, then you need help. Those numbers are factually wrong. I know this because i actually counted the real amount of times they both connected.

The evidence is on the fight video. What are you talking about? There's a reason you can't give me any more punches by Ramirez in the first round outside of the times i gave. It's because he didn't land any more punches. But you say there isn't any evidence?

You're deluded and crazy. Seriously.

[garfios]

Are you as ****** as your comments make out? Or are you just playing ******?

If you think Arum can have corrupt refs and judges but not the guys who press buttons on compubox to convince people Arum's favourite won, then you need help. Those numbers are factually wrong. I know this because i actually counted the real amount of times they both connected.

The evidence is on the fight video. What are you talking about? There's a reason you can't give me any more punches by Ramirez in the first round outside of the times i gave. It's because he didn't land any more punches. But you say there isn't any evidence?

You're deluded and crazy. Seriously.

Fvk off, you're delusional. If you think Arum is going to risk his business to fix a fight, where nothing was in play, you're not playing ******, you're ******. How many websites, experts and people like you have you encountered? Don't reply if is only your opinion.

[Sid-Knee]

Fvk off, you're delusional. If you think Arum is going to risk his business to fix a fight, where nothing was in play, you're not playing ******, you're ******. How many websites, experts and people like you have you encountered? Don't reply if is only your opinion.

It is fixed by the fact those numbers are factually wrong. What part of that don't you understand? If they're not, show me on the fight where Ramirez lands outside of the ones i put? Are you this f3cking ****** or something? Fight. Watch. Use eyes. Tell me where Ramirez lands. Do you want it in f3cking Chinese or something you cabbage? Don't pretend you don't know what i'm asking you to do.

Bob Arum is the most corrupt in all of the US with his mass of robberies. You ****** simpleton. Yet you're saying he'd risk his business? Do you see the FBI investigating after all the corruption he's had on TopRank? No, you don't. Do you see the Police involved with any of the constant corruption in the US with boxing? No you don't.

F3ck out of here.

You've got genuine screws loose. Most of you weirdo's on this forum have. F3cking freaks.

[garfios]

It is fixed by the fact those numbers are factually wrong. What part of that don't you understand? If they're not, show me on the fight where Ramirez lands outside of the ones i put? Are you this f3cking ****** or something? Fight. Watch. Use eyes. Tell me where Ramirez lands. Do you want it in f3cking Chinese or something you cabbage? Don't pretend you don't know what i'm asking you to do.

Bob Arum is the most corrupt in all of the US with his mass of robberies. You ****** simpleton. Yet you're saying he'd risk his business? Do you see the FBI investigating after all the corruption he's had on TopRank? No, you don't. Do you see the Police involved with any of the constant corruption in the US with boxing? No you don't.

F3ck out of here.

You've got genuine screws loose. Most of you weirdo's on this forum have. F3cking freaks.

Yes, you're the only one with all the screws tight up and in their place, which by going with the law of total probability it should be the other way around, or if you're from a bizarre world, like I'm assuming you are, then you're right but in the wrong world, so you still stand alone. Good day son.