Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Conor Benn: I Decapitated Vargas, Van Heerden Better Than Boots and Vergil Ortiz - There's Your Measuring Stick!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Boro View Post

    The laws and bylaws that literally govern UKAD and NADP particularly the NADP are underpinned by the Arbitration act 1996 you dummy, it's literally the crux of the conversation you imbecile.

    And as I've already said multiple times his ability to continue his career effectively in this country is entirely dependant on the outcome of the the appeal, what are you even trying to argue, I didn't say it wasn't over this month so get your head out of your arse...

    I don't know how you have the nerve/audacity to claim i'm failing to grasp anything,

    I've literally said innumerable times if the appeal gets rejected there isn't anything more UKAD can do and NADP are there solely as Arbitrators/tribunal by government mandate/redtaping...

    Your failing to grasp these FACTS and attempting to gaslight me doesn't make you right, it just makes you petulant like I said previously you have a need to be right like a woman.
    I have never disputed that his ability to continue his career in this country is dependent on his appeal outcome.

    All I said is that Conor Benn has gone through the process of a hearing and won said hearing. Which is a fact.

    That's been appealed now meaning it's on going and has to wait until that's finished before moving forward, which is this month.

    It seems you're getting it now, well done kid. Happy to help.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

      I have never disputed that his ability to continue his career in this country is dependent on his appeal outcome.

      All I said is that Conor Benn has gone through the process of a hearing and won said hearing. Which is a fact.

      That's been appealed now meaning it's on going and has to wait until that's finished before moving forward, which is this month.

      It seems you're getting it now, well done kid.
      I mentioned it a multitude of posts ago you rétard, as I pointed out ages ago you clearly lack reading comprehension or I wouldn't have to repeat myself for the umpteenth time.

      You don't "win" something that's ongoing you simpleton, them overturning a provisional suspension doesn't mean anything when he's still able to be banned for real, regardless of outcome it's ongoing...

      I can't believe you're this dense I have to repeat this over and over, I've never felt so much second hand embarrassment in my life it's appalling.

      I literally cannot for the life of me fathom how you've got through life being this dense.

      And worse still being arrogant and attempting to be patronising whilst being this dense.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Boro View Post

        I mentioned it a multitude of posts ago you rétard, as I pointed out ages ago you clearly lack reading comprehension or I wouldn't have to repeat myself for the umpteenth time.

        You don't "win" something that's ongoing you simpleton, them overturning a provisional suspension doesn't mean anything when he's still able to be banned for real, regardless of outcome it's ongoing...

        I can't believe you're this dense I have to repeat this over and over, I've never felt so much second hand embarrassment in my life it's appalling.

        I literally cannot for the life of me fathom how you've got through life being this dense.

        And worse still being arrogant and attempting to be patronising whilst being this dense.
        I know but then I had to help you grasp how the hearing process works here and the fact that he won the hearing (that's now been appealed) because you were struggling but from what I can tell you've got it now.

        Anything else you'd like to know or are we done here?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

          I know but then I had to help you grasp how the hearing process works here and the fact that he won the hearing (that's now been appealed) because you were struggling but from what I can tell you've got it now.

          Anything else you'd like to know or are we done here?
          I understood it long before you boy, you're the one struggling as I pointed out from jump, you don't even grasp the concept of arbitration so how you can even attempt to try and explain the processes inherent.

          But your failed attempt at gaslighting is cute though sweetheart.

          But it doesn't work when you're too thick to grasp basic conversational skills and reading for that matter because gaslighting people properly requires subtle nuance and that's beyond your capabilities, boy.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Boro View Post

            I understood it long before you boy, you're the one struggling as I pointed out from jump, you don't even grasp the concept of arbitration so how you can even attempt to try and explain the processes inherent.

            But your failed attempt at gaslighting is cute though sweetheart.

            But it doesn't work when you're too thick to grasp basic conversational skills and reading for that matter because gaslighting people properly requires subtle nuance and that's beyond your capabilities, boy.
            No you really didn't It took me four times before it sank in.

            You can run along now.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

              No you really didn't It took me four times before it sank in.

              You can run along now.
              Considering i've been mentioning the processes and how NADP isn't involved without fighters choosing to explicitly involving them and also said the appeal being rejected or not is irrelevant to the process currently being ongoing because it's obvious that the outcome at a future date does not change that fact a process is underway...

              And i've been saying said things since page 3 and we've been the vast majority of the replies you dumb fúck, so you might want to reevaluate your warped opinion.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Boro View Post

                Considering i've been mentioning the processes and how NADP isn't involved without fighters choosing to explicitly involving them and also said the appeal being rejected or not is irrelevant to the process currently being ongoing because it's obvious that the outcome at a future date does not change that fact a process is underway...

                And i've been saying said things since page 3 and we've been the vast majority of the replies you dumb fúck, so you might want to reevaluate your warped opinion.
                Mate why are you still going on? I'm aware you've got it now.

                Despite your initial confusion, we've established Conor Benn has had his hearing, we've established that the NADP carry out these hearing, we've established he won the hearing, we've established that that decision has been appealed and the date for that appeal is this month and outcome is TBD.

                There's no more to say on it.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                  Mate why are you still going on? I'm aware you've got it now.

                  Despite your initial confusion, we've established Conor Benn has had his hearing, we've established that the NADP carry out these hearing, we've established he won the hearing, we've established that that decision has been appealed and the date for that appeal is this month and outcome is TBD.

                  There's no more to say on it.
                  I'm responding your rétarded implication that's all, don't make rétarded/nonsensical statements and you won't get responses.

                  As I said I understood the process long before you did, I explained the entire thing to you.

                  And you've tried to imply it's you explaining it to me you narcissistic idiot...

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Boro View Post

                    I'm responding your rétarded implication that's all, don't make rétarded/nonsensical statements and you won't get responses.

                    As I said I understood the process long before you did, I explained the entire thing to you.

                    And you've tried to imply it's you explaining it to me you narcissistic idiot...
                    You didn't but like I said it seems that you do now and that's ok.

                    There's no more to say on it now as like I said we've now established how these things work.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                      You didn't but like I said it seems that you do now and that's ok.

                      There's no more to say on it now as like I said we've now established how these things work.
                      Yes I did I even got down to the nuances of explaining Arbitration laws and mentioning their encompassing "acts" but you keep thinking you informed anyone son ...

                      Jesus christ, kids these days.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP