Comments Thread For: Antonio Tarver: "If Fury Beats Usyk, He Got No Reason To Fight AJ"

[Sid-Knee]

So, the reason to why it shouldn't happen is.... Just because?

That's a great reason for the fight not to happen. I'm sold.

[Corelone]

If Fury takes the steam out of Usyk. I can see AJ v Usyk 3, no kamikaze assault. Sooner or later a vacancy, or a stripped title will occur, but I'm not sure AJ will be up to that.

[Toffee]

If AJ blasts out Ngannou then there will absolutely be clamour for that fight, regardless of what happens between Fury and Usyk.

You haven't beaten someone until you've beaten them. Fury has made a career out of convincing people of the opposite.

[JLC]

Money…

precisely. Don’t go to the Antonio Tarver School of Business please.

[hitmanjosh]

Tarver was a great fighter but business hasn't been great for him so if you want security don't have a bunch of baby mama's and pay your taxes or take his dammmmm advise.

[richardt]

Glad boxing of the 70's and 80's was not like that. They all fought each other regardless of some triangle or parallel theory.

[Jab jab boom]

Legacy wise there would be no reason for him to face AJ. Financially it makes great sense because Brits will buy it in a second. They’ve always adored and overrated AJ over there and have continued to do so despite being exposed multiple times.

[jackblack008]

I have a feeling Usyk would stop Fury

[Gary Coleman]

Good thing Roy didn't think like this, eh 'Tonio.

[LAchargers373]

Easy fight for fury nothing that’s happened recently for either of them has changed that. Fury KOs AJ every time