What made VADA (or the testing lab, whoever it was) decide that increased levels of GHG & TSTR were "atypical" and not "adverse"?
In other words, why did they decide to do additional testing (ofc, at a later date) and not immediately (after one test) deem it as an "adverse" finding, like they do in other cases?
In other words, why did they decide to do additional testing (ofc, at a later date) and not immediately (after one test) deem it as an "adverse" finding, like they do in other cases?
Comment