Comments Thread For: Leigh Wood vs. Josh Warrington Rematch Slated For May 18

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dan-b
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 3266
    • 1,910
    • 2,525
    • 6,731

    #21
    Originally posted by Tag, You're Hit

    I agree. There are too many rematches these days. The worst, though, is rematch CLAUSES. There should be a "clause" that if the fight isn't competitive the rematch clause is null and void. Good points about Warrington, too. I guess I'm not mad about this particular one because it should be close and entertaining.
    Originally posted by Elheath
    In an ideal world, no rematch would be written in contract prior to the fight but will be determined after the first match if the quality deserved one, and it also will be held in a timing that it doesn't hold the division up belt wise.
    Completely agree. I get especially fed up with immediate rematches. Unless there's a compelling reason for one, move on and fight someone different. Arguably the best fighter in the sport right now has his career on hold because of a rematch clause.

    Comment

    • KidDinamita
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 1317
      • 112
      • 1
      • 17,290

      #22
      rematch is not needed, Warrington couldn't hurt Wood and does not have the power to stop him

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP