Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Conor Benn: Science Don't Lie, I Do Believe The Benefit of The Doubt Should Be Given

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    This is an open and shut case. Men lie. Women lie. Children lie. The sciences tho? They never lie! Conor egg deserves the benefit of the doubt because the sciences told me to. It’s pretty clear cut

    Comment


    • #22
      It's amazing how deluded you are. Youre right tho, the science doesn't lie. Even stevie wonder could see you are roided to the gills
      Last edited by allen23; 01-06-2024, 06:42 AM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

        In his defence, he probably presented at the hearing that he won.

        Maybe that's why he won it? Who knows.

        It's time to move on from all this really.
        No, he didn't.

        The WBC ruling was based on a report identifying eggs, which hemn has disputed.

        The UK decision was based on jurisdiction regarding the VADA tests.

        I'm pretty sure Benn has never presented his reports to either ukad or bbbc.

        It's not really time to move on until Benn is brought to account for two failed drug tests.
        Last edited by tokon; 01-06-2024, 07:10 AM.
        SugarDeanC*ntly SugarDeanC*ntly likes this.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by sege64 View Post

          Yeah, it's 270 pages don't ya know.
          I've actually read it. It begins: "Once upon a time there was a boy called Conor and he was a very good boy..." and concludes: "...and then Eddie cleared me! And we all lived happily ever after! The End."
          Aaaah. THAT fairy tale! Hahaha.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by thack View Post
            He wants to fight in England where he's banned , so he should go in front of the BBBOC as all others have and face the music.
            Word!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by tokon View Post

              No, he didn't.

              The WBC ruling was based on a report identifying eggs, which hemn has disputed.

              The UK decision was based on jurisdiction regarding the VADA tests.

              I'm pretty sure Benn has never presented his reports to either ukad or bbbc.

              It's not really time to move on until Benn is brought to account for two failed drug tests.
              Exactly, if fighters aren't held accountable for failed drug tests then what's the point in doing the tests.

              How many mc clellands do we need to stop this nonsense. The twat needs to be banned
              tokon tokon likes this.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by tokon View Post

                I agree with what you're saying but maybe a bad example as I think nandrolone decanoate is detectable for months after use.
                wow thats odd isnt it? i mean i though half life & then cleared from body, well if that is the stuff that fury did take then maybe its a bad ped to take seems to me on the surface anyway, high window for getting caught or am i missing something obvious here
                tokon tokon likes this.

                Comment


                • #28
                  He doesn't speak like someone who understands the scientific method, which is hardly surprising.
                  tokon tokon likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by tokon View Post

                    No, he didn't.

                    The WBC ruling was based on a report identifying eggs, which hemn has disputed.

                    The UK decision was based on jurisdiction regarding the VADA tests.

                    I'm pretty sure Benn has never presented his reports to either ukad or bbbc.

                    It's not really time to move on until Benn is brought to account for two failed drug tests.
                    How do yo know it was based off jurisdiction? The contents of NADP hearings are confidential. We don’t know what evidence was presented in his hearing.

                    He has been brought to account. He’s had his hearing, he won it. Right or wrong, that’s just how it is.

                    It’s now time to move on.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by thack View Post
                      He wants to fight in England where he's banned , so he should go in front of the BBBOC as all others have and face the music.
                      Exactly

                      You can't complain about the board not letting you fight when you're refusing to go before them to fight your case
                      tokon tokon likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP