serious question..why did pacman fight morales after he lost to raheem??

[MOTHER DUCKER]

I don't have a problem with the rematch because everyone has a right to avenge their lose. The 3rd fight is what has me confused, also the rematch against MAB.

Like i said can you imagine if Floyd had rematched Chico after he totally whopped on him in devestating fashion? he would be ****ted on and rightly so, some reason pac gets a pass..

[razor.thin]

So it was about money.

yes..........

[razor.thin]

Like i said can you imagine if Floyd had rematched Chico after he totally whopped on him in devestating fashion? he would be ****ted on and rightly so, some reason pac gets a pass..

but chico didnt beat floyd and morales vs pac 2 was close.

[joartcc5]

Who was talking about Floyd? Grow up.

Dude grow up.

Im just shoving it in for good measure.

It's a moot point and what will matter is that pac emerged as the top dog out of the FAB4 of his era.

Gayweather couldn't even do half of what Pac did.

So grow up. Criticising an ATG who has 4 lineals regarding his resume is like eating ur own crap of ******ity.

[MOTHER DUCKER]

but chico didnt beat floyd and morales vs pac 2 was close.

Mainly talking about Barrera 1 as that was a complete shutout basically much like Floyd vs Chico, i cant understand the reason for a rematch at all, was a terrible fight 2nd time round too

[IMDAZED]

Dude grow up.

Im just shoving it in for good measure.

It's a moot point and what will matter is that pac emerged as the top dog out of the FAB4 of his era.

Gayweather couldn't even do half of what Pac did.

So grow up. Criticising an ATG who has 4 lineals regarding his resume is like eating ur own crap of ******ity.

What's your problem? I didn't mention Floyd so I'm not sure why you're talking about him to me.

Second, yes I'll criticize a fighter if he KOs someone, then someone else kicks the guy's a**, then he goes back to KO him again. It was pointless. And you're right, Pac has emerged from all that and proven himself to be one of the greats. That doesn't mean we can't discuss the past.

[mellow_mood]

because they were already set to have a rematch.

Pacquiao's career & mayweathers careers are different, people need to realize that and accept it.

damn natas you killed it on the very first post!

[joartcc5]

Pacquiao's career & mayweathers careers are different, people need to realize that and accept it.

Exactly.

Pac's career is all about...

1. jumping 10 divisions in total
2. fighting the very best
3. becoming the only boxer to garner 4 lineal titles out of his 6 titles

Gayweather's career is all abou...

1. Claiming you're better than Robinson and Ali
2. Then proceeds to fight Baldomir, Judah, Gatti and a bloated JMM
3. Then proceeds to ***** retire ducking every guy which is a threat to him

The former is a career of a true ATG.

The latter is a career of a FRAUD ATG.

[joartcc5]

What's your problem? I didn't mention Floyd so I'm not sure why you're talking about him to me.

Second, yes I'll criticize a fighter if he KOs someone, then someone else kicks the guy's a**, then he goes back to KO him again. It was pointless. And you're right, Pac has emerged from all that and proven himself to be one of the greats. That doesn't mean we can't discuss the past.

I stand corrected.

[madsweeney]

PBF stans have issues with pac not fighting "slick black fighters"...considering there were no realistic opponents until 140 (even then Hatton was the lineal champ) where Pac's only had ONE fight he's getting ****ted on for supposedly ducking these fighters all his career. And now Pac is calling out PBF and pushing and pushing for this fight to happen after Cotto but yet he's still ducking him?!?

Pac has yet to fight a "slick AA" boxer which is true. But to say he's ducking them WHILE HE'S CALLING OUT THE BEST OF THEM is pure Idiocracy.