serious question..why did pacman fight morales after he lost to raheem??

[tesla_power]

no i was asking a serious question...but got alot of biased answers

Nah man. You made up your mind already and clearly blatantly engage in any discussion.

If Raheem would have gone down at 130, it could be possible but I do not want to see it. Would you want to see it? Or this question really stemmed up with the "PAC is ducking AA fighters"?

About Diaz, pac was just testing his skills there. You can even call it a tune up if you like. Hell, you even compared dlh and hatton to 135 champions. I don't know but IMO those are higher risk opponent because of their size. In the end, it's all about the risk. Pac is respected more because he is winning even when people do not give him a chance... and surprising/entertaining them of the outcome ... plus, winning despite his vulnerabilities.

Pbf is really a victim of his own hype. By continuously telling people he is greater, he should be responsible enough to make good with his action. Sad to say, this is not the case if he continues this comeback without facing any risk.

[El Angel]

The fight with Morales was already signed before Morales lost to Raheem. Pacquiao and Morales had their rematch in January, then Raheem lost to Freitas in April in an awful fight. Arum probably didn't see much in the bout for Pacquiao, especially after how Raheem looked against Freitas. Seems like they made the right choice.

[xAUGUSTUSx]

instead of fighting raheem????people never mention this..floyd fought judah after he lost to baldo but got critisized by brian kenny..BUT..he fought baldo in his very next fight..then got ****ted on for that fight..so why didnt pacman EVER fight raheem??

You being such a Floyd fan you should know this one. It's money and entertainment. People still wanted to see it.

[fabzmm]

**** Roach knows a african american slick boxer would embarass Pacquiao just like Raheem did to Morales.

[baracuda]

**** Roach knows a african american slick boxer would embarass Pacquiao just like Raheem did to Morales.

those slick boxers youre talking about throw 10 punches and run for two minutes per round.....you gotta do better than that to beat pac.....

[Pullcounter]

**** Roach knows a african american slick boxer would embarass Pacquiao just like Raheem did to Morales.

the raheem fight was at 135 right? wasn't morales moving up in weight?

[MaD RoBoT]

no i was asking a serious question...but got alot of biased answers

no you're asking a attention whoring question

a lot of answers been posted yet u chose to ignore it

instead you came mumbling why Floyd was treated ****

coz thats what it is & will be unless Floyd faces a legit competition

[go1nbanana]

but floyd fought baldo in his next fight...........when did pacman fight raheem??????????never...why??

if Raheem keep on winning his fights, not just one shot on EM, IMO he could have a shot with Pac. his single win with EM (and then losing to bums) just look illegitimate

[whirlwind]

instead of fighting raheem????people never mention this..floyd fought judah after he lost to baldo but got critisized by brian kenny..BUT..he fought baldo in his very next fight..then got ****ted on for that fight..so why didnt pacman EVER fight raheem??

Another clueless Floyd stan! Do your homework first as this will save you for more embarassment.

[larry x]

so the answers were..it wasnt a money fight
raheem was too big..lol
the rematch was already signed even tho morales lost
and because raheem lost after beating morales..even tho pacman fought morales and larios after they lost..lol