Originally posted by messi807
View Post
Also the other disingenuous part about you is your persistent picking and choosing of the argument that fits your narrative.
Or whatever you conveniently like to reply to, you completely ignored the valid part above and below to mention the less meaningful and less poignant "ARABZ ARE WHYTE"
Also I'd argue Arabs and their slavery is much further reaching consequences as it's still occuring and unlike your exaggerated version of ruining the continent or having any effects on their culture, language and families you propose whiteys have had.
Arabs actually did ruin the continent, culture, language and families by making the men Eunuchs and literally ending the bloodline, there is no real mixed population in the Arab world because of that unlike in the west pretty much disproving your "theory" about whitey.
Also like I said previously whitey wasn't in the interior of Africa to slave until the invention and mass production of Quinine, which didn't come until the END of slavery and essentially brought about colonisation.
So that means as I pointed out before it was Africans ruining the continent, culture, language, families for weaker African tribes and selling to the Portuguese initially just like the Vikings did, Genghis Khan did, Attila the Hun, The Romans etc etc across multiple countries and continents.
And lastly Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Russia, Japan, Germany, China and The Dutch attempted and some succeeded for a time to do across multiple continents.
It's the way of the world of unfortunately as I said previously.
Comment