Reach numbers Wilder 83 Parker 76 big difference.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingOutlaw
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2017
    • 481
    • 55
    • 24
    • 23,453

    #1

    Reach numbers Wilder 83 Parker 76 big difference.

    All measurements favor Wilder.
  • QueensburyRules
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2018
    • 22444
    • 2,446
    • 18
    • 187,708

    #2
    Originally posted by BoxingOutlaw
    All measurements favor Wilder.
    - - U data points favor a slab of bacon over another, not boxing

    Comment

    • BoxingOutlaw
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2017
      • 481
      • 55
      • 24
      • 23,453

      #3
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules

      - - U data points favor a slab of bacon over another, not boxing
      Wilder is perfect when having the longer reach.
      If Wilder was 4'11" and 90 lbs would he still be the favorite? You sound like you have a womens brain trapped in your head.

      Comment

      • Clegg
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 24673
        • 3,726
        • 2,307
        • 233,274

        #4
        True, but even if Parker had an equal reach, Wilder often lands that big right from a distance. So Parker shouldn't be spending too much time boxing at range anyway, he can win some rounds that way but will get caught before long.

        Comment

        • Spray_resistant
          Vacant interim regular(C)
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 29517
          • 2,917
          • 1,537
          • 53,384

          #5
          This would be more relevant info if Wilder was a jabber/mover who could fight moving laterally or going backwards and not a fighter who uses a pawing range finder instead of a jab just to land one big power shot.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP