Tweet
World Boxing Council boss Mauricio Sulaiman wasn't too pleased with a rival sanctioning body's decision to strip Terence Crawford of his 147-pound belt.
[Click Here To Read More]
[Click Here To Read More]
-
-
From one extreme to another
Sulaiman should be explain how some fighters , who are WBC champs , have not been stripped after holding those titles hostage
-
If Bud tells dude that he's depressed homeboy will let him keep the belt for years tho is the thing. I'd rather guys who aren't fighting mando's be stripped than you hold up a division for yrs. I'm a fan of keeping it moving.Comment
-
Was the right move to allow boots the chance for others to stop using the “high risk low reward” bs. Specially bud.
THC
Combat Talk Radio
like this.
Comment
-
These casuals are weird defending Boots getting an emailed a belt
Str8.2.Da.Point
likes this.
Comment
-
Actually it was not the right move you dumb ass ibf knew exactly that bud had a rematch obligation and stripped him 3 month after he earned that belt you defending the bull**** because you have a hatred towards BudOriginally posted by Robi13 View Post
ptek
champion4ever
like this.
Comment
-
I don’t hate bud you dumbass, I hate the politics as far as not giving a fighter in boots position a chance because he is too “high risk low reward”. DumbassOriginally posted by pretty ste View PostComment
-
The IBF. Stripping Crawford is disgusting. Does anyone actually think that anyone other than Crawford is the Champion?! IBF, your welterweight title on anyone other than Crawford is worthless. Meaningless. A joke.
ptek
likes this.
Comment
-
Completely agree, the only thing this corrupt belt maker is a fan of is money!Originally posted by MulaKO View PostComment
-
Was he also "Sick as a fan" when He stripped Haney of his 135 title because of a nonexistent injury and deemed him "champ is recess"?
Or was it because Haney was working with Hearn, not Haymon like Bud?
Combat Talk Radio
likes this.
Comment
Comment