Dude, you can spin this **** anyway you want to. Tiger Woods is on a different level then Pac. Really, to argue the point, would be like talking to a brick wall with you. This has nothing to do with "Boxing versus Golf" as a sport. Pac is nowhere near Tigers level. Simple as.
'Pacquiao more influential than Kobe, LeBron and Tiger'
Collapse
-
-
bud , there's a lot of filipinos in the bay area and southern california.
vegas is just where he fights.
his fanbase in the u.s. is mainly in california.Comment
-
-
LOL at anyone in the sporting world, who's name isn't Jordan, being more influential that Tiger Woods. Come on, askmen.com brought some jokes on that one.Comment
-
Comment
-
Not many in Mexico, Asia, South America, Pacific Islands know or care about golf. They don't give a **** about some rich guys getting paid to hit a tiny ball around a giant 10 Acre course that would be better off used as land for cheap housing. A lot of those cats rather watch mini-golf. Just because rich people and a lot of the U.S. knows Tiger doesn't mean he's popular on a global scale. Boxing is worldwide sport that both rich and poor watch and enjoy. Usain Bolt makes some sense in terms of popularity. Everyone watches the Olympics and the man is an Olympic hero.Tiger Wodds whether you like Golf or not is a name that people in general know regardless of what country you visit. He's mainstream. That's not the case with Pacman. Outside his country people in general don't know who the dude is. Pacman is not a major star like that. Mike Tyson is a boxer with that type of starpower around the world, and to some degree Evander Holyfield.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment

.
Comment