Comments Thread For: Devin Haney: I Should Be Fighter Of The Year; My Dad Deserves Trainer Of The Year

[Combat Talk Radio]

I don't think he gets extra credit because it was a voluntary or because it was his first title defence and I most definitely won't give any credit for giving up titles. You give him extra credit I don't.

And Crawford doesn't get "extra credit" for beating one guy and never defending and definitely no credit for getting stripped after ducking.


You completely ignored the Kambosos reference (that he was a weak champion, proven by his first title defense, and you couldn't know that until he defended, which means we didn't know if Haney would be a weak unified until he defended, and we don't know if Crawford is a weak until he defends).

So...you're just a mark.

[SteveM]

And Crawford doesn't get "extra credit" for beating one guy and never defending and definitely no credit for getting stripped after ducking.


You completely ignored the Kambosos reference (that he was a weak champion, proven by his first title defense, and you couldn't know that until he defended, which means we didn't know if Haney would be a weak unified until he defended, and we don't know if Crawford is a weak until he defends).

So...you're just a mark.

finally the insult arrives. I asked you to mention the other fighters you are working yourself into a lather about. But no, you just try ramming a pointless question down someone's throat - because you seek and need to validate your supposedly superior boxing knowledge.

But for someone with this superior knowledge you sure sound dumb when you can't already tell just by looking at them that A/ Kambosos never was and never will be and B/ Crawford is a HOF and maybe ATG.

Another one on the ignore list.

[_Rexy_]

Which is a ****** reason for a supposed fan of boxing to choose. I suspect, though, like most claims like this it just applies to an angry minority of terminally online edgelords.

Jesus you're trying too hard. You post like an insecure fking phaggot.

[Smash]

forget about those accolades, how about ego's of the decade

[_Rexy_]

That’s actually the only Tapales fight I watched & majority of posters thought it was a gift. And then his fight before that was against a guy 23-18…that pretty much sum’s it up.

did YOU think it was a gift? who cares what other posters thought. I thought it was a 7-5 either guy fight, but that's me. Shouldn't impact YOUR score at all.


And why do you care about him taking a tuneup? Guys from Thailand and the Phillapines will fight guys like that instead taking a long expensive camp (like americans used to do) and get paid for what is essentially a tune up/spar. Prior to that 23-18-1 opponent he fought someone 22-2-2. This is like saying SRR was a bum because before he beat Chocolitio twice and Estrada (in a 12 month span) he fought 3 debut guys, and 2 guys with losing records (all five fights in less than a year)