The writer should have challenged Wilder with the proof he supposedly has as the prize on the line they were fighting for. The writer most likely would have outboxed Wilder for 8 or 9 rds but then got ko'd in the 10th by a sloppy eyes closed windmill.
Wilder then would have thanked God and claimed once again he doesn't need to learn how to box because he just needs to be perfect for 1 second.
It would be a tough loss for the writer and where would he go from there? Maybe Berto/Ghost winner?
Maybe I would interview the writer after and he would claim Wilder cheated which he has proof of and then I of course would have challenged the writer for said proof thus continuing the lineage of speculative proof of cheating claims as a new boxing title often fought for and disputed frequently.
Wilder then would have thanked God and claimed once again he doesn't need to learn how to box because he just needs to be perfect for 1 second.
It would be a tough loss for the writer and where would he go from there? Maybe Berto/Ghost winner?
Maybe I would interview the writer after and he would claim Wilder cheated which he has proof of and then I of course would have challenged the writer for said proof thus continuing the lineage of speculative proof of cheating claims as a new boxing title often fought for and disputed frequently.
Comment