Prime Haney vs Prime Pacquiao at @140
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Fanboys are going to say Pac beat’s whomever, pointless argument.
However if you want to delve into facts. Pac has fought 3 elite counter-punchers in his career and lost to all THREE. Marquez, (a past prime Morales, in a fight he got outboxed and barely won more than 3 rounds) and a 38 year old Floyd who had his way with Pac for 9 rounds.
Haney would probably beat him at 140, Pac was an amazing fighter - never unbeatable though, no matter what nonsense his fans push.Last edited by messi807; 12-10-2023, 12:18 AM.Comment
-
Yo, I hear you, but I gotta disagree. Just 'cause Pac's footwork ain't like Prograis', don't mean he'd automatically have more chances against Haney. Styles and game plans in the ring, they're a whole different ball game, you feel me?Comment
-
Yeah, for sure. Those fanboys ride or die for Pac, but when you check the facts, it's clear. Pacquiao struggled against those elite counter-punchers like Marquez, an older Morales, and Floyd - all handed him losses. Haney at 140? He might just snatch that victory. Pac was a beast, no doubt, but let's face it, he wasn't untouchable, no matter how much some fans wanna believe it.Fanboys are going to say Pac beat’s whomever, pointless argument.
However if you want to delve into facts. Pac has fought 3 elite counter-punchers in his career and lost to all THREE. Marquez, (a past prime Morales, in a fight he barely won more than 3 rounds) and Floyd.
Haney would probably beat him at 140, Pac was an amazing fighter - never unbeatable though, no matter what nonsense his fans push.Comment
-
Yo, I gotta disagree on that one. Saying the 140-pound Pacquiao would take down Haney, Tank, and Crawford in one night? That's reaching, man. Each of those fighters got their own game, their own strengths. Comparing them like that just ain't right; it's a whole different ball game.Comment
Comment