what are you getting at? i don't understand what the problem is with some of you.some of you guys are ridiculous. i don't even like molsey, but just cause arum says floyds should fight em, you got a problem with him?what hall of famer can floyd fight while waiting on cotto/pac?seriously, smfh.
be a real fan, if you're gonna cheer for a fighter, cheer for him to reach greatness.greatness in boxing isn't solely achieved on ability.heart is just as important if not more.i want to see floyd fight on cause I'm a fan of his.if that makes me a real fan, i don't know what that makes a lot of you.sounds like some of you rather he hang the gloves up.
I didn't say I had a problem with it. I've said that I'd like Mayweather to take care of Shane next, then go for the Pacquiao vs. Cotto winner. This thread doesn't have anything to do with that though.
Me, I think he didn't do **** at L.W and his overall resume isn't all that.
Poll to come.
Mosley has had a very good career with both high-points and low. His career isn't spectacular but it is note-worthy. All of which would have earned him a place in the HOF.
But any fighter that has used roids in a sanctioned fight should lose that eligibility and be banned from consideration. This includes any fighter, not just Mosley, who has fought a sanctioned fight under the influence of chemical enhancements.
There has to be a line in the sand, when it comes to the HOF, otherwise you diminish its value and distinction.
My problem with this thread is that the TS REALLY thinks and knows that Shane is a HOF, but is denying it just to point out his love for PBF. You're not a true boxing fan if you think Shane isn't a HOFer.
Comment