People in here saying if Andrade is a fraud does that make Usyk and Crawford frauds “if they lose or if they lost” 
What kind of backwards logic is that?
Crawford has more undisputed titles than Andrade has beaten ranked opponents.
Usyk has unified more divisions than Andrade has beaten ranked opponents.
So no, they aren’t frauds, objectively.

What kind of backwards logic is that?
Crawford has more undisputed titles than Andrade has beaten ranked opponents.
Usyk has unified more divisions than Andrade has beaten ranked opponents.
So no, they aren’t frauds, objectively.
Comment