Comments Thread For: Nick Ball Powers Past Isaac Dogboe, Secures Wide Decision in WBC Final Eliminator

[BlackRobb]

Now tell me which rounds you had for Ramirez. Then i'll give you my score card and what was landed by each in every round.

Each time I laugh at your drug-fueled delusions, you ask me to watch the fight and score each round. I just did. This is the last time I'm entertaining your lunacy. The fight was not even close. I previously said 9-3 Ramirez. I was wrong. It was 11-1 Ramirez with an extra point for the knockdown in the 12th. I gave Dogboe only the fifth, and I had to strain to give him that round. It was a virtual whitewash. Ramirez looked like he was in a sparring session. My scorecard is below. Go take your meds and do not waste my fkn time like this again with your insanity, you fkn clown!

And do forget to produce your scorecard. Don't run away like a little b***h like you did when I asked you to bet on Wallin-Joshua and Miller-Dubois.


1-Ramirez
2-Ramirez (Dogboe stunned twice)
3-Ramirez (Closer round; good body shots by Dogboe)
4-Ramirez (Good work by Dogboe, but too many lulls in his attack)
5-Dogboe
6-Ramirez
7-Ramirez
8-Ramirez
9-Ramirez
10-Ramirez
11-Ramirez
12-Ramirez (2 pts.)

[Sid-Knee]

Each time I laugh at your drug-fueled delusions, you ask me to watch the fight and score each round. I just did. This is the last time I'm entertaining your lunacy. The fight was not even close. I previously said 9-3 Ramirez. I was wrong. It was 11-1 Ramirez with an extra point for the knockdown in the 12th. I gave Dogboe only the fifth, and I had to strain to give him that round. It was a virtual whitewash. Ramirez looked like he was in a sparring session. My scorecard is below. Go take your meds and do not waste my fkn time like this again with your insanity, you fkn clown!

And do forget to produce your scorecard. Don't run away like a little b***h like you did when I asked you to bet on Wallin-Joshua and Miller-Dubois.


1-Ramirez
2-Ramirez (Dogboe stunned twice)
3-Ramirez (Closer round; good body shots by Dogboe)
4-Ramirez (Good work by Dogboe, but too many lulls in his attack)
5-Dogboe
6-Ramirez
7-Ramirez
8-Ramirez
9-Ramirez
10-Ramirez
11-Ramirez
12-Ramirez (2 pts.)

What, this is the last time you entertain me with giving me your scorecard for a fight? I think you'll find it's the only time you've done so. Haha. But i'll be back with mine tomorrow, so you can get ready to deflect like crazy when the facts come to town.

1 round? Haha. Hilarious.

[BlackRobb]

What, this is the last time you entertain me with giving me your scorecard for a fight? I think you'll find it's the only time you've done so. Haha. But i'll be back with mine tomorrow, so you can get ready to deflect like crazy when the facts come to town.

1 round? Haha. Hilarious.

Yep, one round, and even that was a stretch. I hope you don't go out into public saying Issac Dog Sht was robbed against Ramirez. Someone will call the guys with the white coats and butterfly nets to gave you committed. Again.

[Sid-Knee]

Yep, one round, and even that was a stretch. I hope you don't go out into public saying Issac Dog Sht was robbed against Ramirez. Someone will call the guys with the white coats and butterfly nets to gave you committed. Again.

Round 1 Dogboe lands 7, Ramirez lands 4.
Round 2 Dogboe lands 10, Ramirez lands 4.
Round 3 Dogbow lands 9, Ramirez lands 6.
Round 4 Dogboe lands 9, Ramirez lands 3.
Round 5 Dogboe lands 12, Ramirez lands 5.
Round 6 Dogboe lands 15, Ramirez lands 6.

Not once does Ramirez come close to out-landing Dogboe in the first 6 rounds. Now, tell me how he could possibly win with these stats? Dogboe clearly out-lands him in all 6 rounds. How is that possible if Ramirez dominated?

But i want to focus on round 6. Tell me how Ramirez won it when nearly every shot missed or hit the guard? Dogboe out-lands him nearly 3-1. How is that possible?

See you soon when you deflect when i ask you to list all the clean shots Ramirez lands in this round and what the time on the clock is. It's going to be fun. I can give the time for every shot landed. Hey, you can even slow the video down on YT too to see if the punch connected or not. There's no getting out of it. Deflection or get proven wrong. Either way, you lose.

What's funny is, you thought this was the fight you'd score as you thought it would be the one where you'd be closer to being correct. You ran from scoring the others because you knew you couldn't justify it. But you've still find out to your cost that you're wrong on this fight too. How funny is that.

[BlackRobb]

Round 1 Dogboe lands 7, Ramirez lands 4.
Round 2 Dogboe lands 10, Ramirez lands 4.
Round 3 Dogbow lands 9, Ramirez lands 6.
Round 4 Dogboe lands 9, Ramirez lands 3.
Round 5 Dogboe lands 12, Ramirez lands 5.
Round 6 Dogboe lands 15, Ramirez lands 6.

Not once does Ramirez come close to out-landing Dogboe in the first 6 rounds. Now, tell me how he could possibly win with these stats? Dogboe clearly out-lands him in all 6 rounds. How is that possible if Ramirez dominated?

But i want to focus on round 6. Tell me how Ramirez won it when nearly every shot missed or hit the guard? Dogboe out-lands him nearly 3-1. How is that possible?

See you soon when you deflect when i ask you to list all the clean shots Ramirez lands in this round and what the time on the clock is. It's going to be fun. I can give the time for every shot landed. Hey, you can even slow the video down on YT too to see if the punch connected or not. There's no getting out of it. Deflection or get proven wrong. Either way, you lose.

What's funny is, you thought this was the fight you'd score as you thought it would be the one where you'd be closer to being correct. You ran from scoring the others because yWou knew you couldn't justify it. But you've still find out to your cost that you're wrong on this fight too. How funny is that.

You know what's funny? What's funny is how you start to hallucinate when you don't take your meds. No sane person had Ramirez-Dogboe close. I canvassed various credible websites that scored the fight and none of them gave Dogboe more than three rounds. Ring Magazine, BoxingScene, Boxing Junkie all scored 9-3 Ramirez. DraftKings scored 8-4 Ramirez, and that was quite generous. All in all, not a dingle reputable boxing website scores that fight close.

It's very clear that you suffer from some type of acute mental illness.

The DraftKings round-by-round scorecard is below:

https://dknetwork.draftkings.com/2023/4/1/23657635/robeisy-ramirez-vs-isaac-dogboe-results-live-round-by-round-updates-winner-scorecards

[Sid-Knee]

You know what's funny? What's funny is how you start to hallucinate when you don't take your meds. No sane person had Ramirez-Dogboe close. I canvassed various credible websites that scored the fight and none of them gave Dogboe more than three rounds. Ring Magazine, BoxingScene, Boxing Junkie all scored 9-3 Ramirez. DraftKings scored 8-4 Ramirez, and that was quite generous. All in all, not a dingle reputable boxing website scores that fight close.

It's very clear that you suffer from some type of acute mental illness.

The DraftKings round-by-round scorecard is below:

https://dknetwork.draftkings.com/202...ner-scorecards

Ah, look, a strawman and deflection. I don't give a shlt about anyone's score card. I'm talking about the cold hard facts here. Let's go over the 6th round and let's see you justify Ramirez winning it when he's out-landed at nearly 3-1. Then we'll go over the other rounds and watch you struggle to justify those rounds too. It should be easy to prove your point if Ramirez did indeed win as clearly as you say. But no, you're cowering again like you always do. That's what people do when they can't win an argument against facts and evidence. Do you know what evidence and facts are? I'm using them to dominate this discussion with ease while you pull your strawmen from your farmers field again.

Go and actually look up what mental illness is. Then see which of us has all of the symptoms of such an illness. But hey, you do love to project you lot over there, don't you.

[BlackRobb]

Ah, look, a strawman and deflection. I don't give a shlt about anyone's score card. I'm talking about the cold hard facts here. Let's go over the 6th round and let's see you justify Ramirez winning it when he's out-landed at nearly 3-1. Then we'll go over the other rounds and watch you struggle to justify those rounds too. It should be easy to prove your point if Ramirez did indeed win as clearly as you say. But no, you're cowering again like you always do. That's what people do when they can't win an argument against facts and evidence. Do you know what evidence and facts are? I'm using them to dominate this discussion with ease while you pull your strawmen from your farmers field again.

Go and actually look up what mental illness is. Then see which of us has all of the symptoms of such an illness. But hey, you do love to project you lot over there, don't you.

So scorecards only matter when they support you bullsht, huh? The facts of the matter are that Dog Food won maybe 1 of 12 rounds if we're being generous. You're clearly off your meds if you think he got robbed.

I guess Dog Food also got robbed against Navarrete. Hahahahahaha!

Maybe Dog Food can next challenge Espinoza and get decapitated.

[Sid-Knee]

So scorecards only matter when they support you bullsht, huh? The facts of the matter are that Dog Food won maybe 1 of 12 rounds if we're being generous. You're clearly off your meds if you think he got robbed.

I guess Dog Food also got robbed against Navarrete. Hahahahahaha!

Maybe Dog Food can next challenge Espinoza and get decapitated.

How can my scorecard be bullshlt when i'm going on cold hard facts? It's their cards that are factually bullshlt. The fact you won't go over a single round with me tells me all i need to know. You can't argue with facts so you want to shut it down like you did with every other fight. At least you went further with this one in giving a card. But then again, i think you just searched for other cards and copied them instead of actually watching the fight and scoring.

I can back my position. You, and the other cards, factually can't. There's a huge difference between us.

[BlackRobb]

How can my scorecard be bullshlt when i'm going on cold hard facts? It's their cards that are factually bullshlt. The fact you won't go over a single round with me tells me all i need to know. You can't argue with facts so you want to shut it down like you did with every other fight. At least you went further with this one in giving a card. But then again, i think you just searched for other cards and copied them instead of actually watching the fight and scoring.

I can back my position. You, and the other cards, factually can't. There's a huge difference between us.

Your "facts" are more like fantasies, which is typically what happens when you forget to take your meds. So did Dog Food get robbed twice against Navarrete? If you want to see a real fighter in the ring against all odds, go watch Arguello vs. Watt. You've had few fighters with that much bottle.

[Sid-Knee]

Your "facts" are more like fantasies, which is typically what happens when you forget to take your meds. So did Dog Food get robbed twice against Navarrete? If you want to see a real fighter in the ring against all odds, go watch Arguello vs. Watt. You've had few fighters with that much bottle.

How can facts be fantasies? If they're fantasies, wouldn't you go over this round and the others and prove it? What are you waiting for? Come and prove me wrong. But you won't, you'll throw fallacies around and run instead.

There you go again with your fallacies with the Navarrete and Dogboe comment. Navarrete won them, i have no problem with those fights.

I look forward to you coming back and deflecting again and proving me right as always.