Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Navarrete: Conceicao Deserves Rematch, But That Decision Doesn't Depend 100% on Me

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    I'll get back to you on this as i've been busy lately. But i can assure you, Navarrete did not win most of the rounds given. I'll present the actual punch stats (I'll do it myself) and show you why Navarrete couldn't possibly win most of those rounds.

    I'll give you the numbers tomorrow.
    That’s fine, consider who hurt who more with those punches too because that matters too

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

      That’s fine, consider who hurt who more with those punches too because that matters too
      Navarrete hurt Conceicao once outside of the KD's. Unless you can point out where he was supposedly hurt? Being tired is not getting hurt.

      Right, i've just watched and scored it in great detail.

      Rd 1 Nav lands 3, Con lands 12.
      Rd 2 Nav lands 9, Con lands 12.
      Rd 3 Nav lands 3, Con lands 16.
      Rd 4 is Navarrete.
      Rd 5 Nav lands 4, Con lands 15.
      Rd 6 Nav lands 8, Con lands 17.
      Rd 7 is Navarrete.
      Rd 8 Nav lands 9, Con lands 19.
      Rd 9 Nav lands 10, Con lands 15.
      Rd 10 Nav lands 12, Con lands 12.
      Rd 11 Nav lands 15, Con lands 24.
      Rd 12 Nav lands 8, Con lands 24.

      Outside of the KD rounds, not once does Navarrete outland Conceicao. The best he gets is round 10 where they're even in connects. You have Navarrete winning the 6th which is not happening in this lifetime. Round 9 is one of the closer rounds, but he's still out-landed 15-10. He didn't win that round. Then you have Navarrete winning the 11th which he also didn't do at all. Navarrete is out-landed 24-11. Sorry, but you can't argue those rounds for him.

      At best, Navarrete takes 3 rounds. If i'm giving him a gimme with 4 rounds, that's him still losing it by 2 points with it being 8-4 for Conceicao but with Navarrete getting 2 KD's. Not a chance did he come close to drawing, let alone winning like you had him. Navarrete lost and lost clearly. Sorry.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

        Navarrete hurt Conceicao once outside of the KD's. Unless you can point out where he was supposedly hurt? Being tired is not getting hurt.

        Right, i've just watched and scored it in great detail.

        Rd 1 Nav lands 3, Con lands 12.
        Rd 2 Nav lands 9, Con lands 12.
        Rd 3 Nav lands 3, Con lands 16.
        Rd 4 is Navarrete.
        Rd 5 Nav lands 4, Con lands 15.
        Rd 6 Nav lands 8, Con lands 17.
        Rd 7 is Navarrete.
        Rd 8 Nav lands 9, Con lands 19.
        Rd 9 Nav lands 10, Con lands 15.
        Rd 10 Nav lands 12, Con lands 12.
        Rd 11 Nav lands 15, Con lands 24.
        Rd 12 Nav lands 8, Con lands 24.

        Outside of the KD rounds, not once does Navarrete outland Conceicao. The best he gets is round 10 where they're even in connects. You have Navarrete winning the 6th which is not happening in this lifetime. Round 9 is one of the closer rounds, but he's still out-landed 15-10. He didn't win that round. Then you have Navarrete winning the 11th which he also didn't do at all. Navarrete is out-landed 24-11. Sorry, but you can't argue those rounds for him.

        At best, Navarrete takes 3 rounds. If i'm giving him a gimme with 4 rounds, that's him still losing it by 2 points with it being 8-4 for Conceicao but with Navarrete getting 2 KD's. Not a chance did he come close to drawing, let alone winning like you had him. Navarrete lost and lost clearly. Sorry.
        lol all I saw was the first round nava landing three to know you didn’t count sh.it right because Navarrete landed more then 3 in that round, that’s exactly what compunot had him landing the rest I didn’t even read, plus you have an agenda against Mexico and Mexicans so how can you be trusted? You can’t. It’s a majority draw with one judged giving it to nava get over it

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

          lol all I saw was the first round nava landing three to know you didn’t count sh.it right because Navarrete landed more then 3 in that round, that’s exactly what compunot had him landing the rest I didn’t even read, plus you have an agenda against Mexico and Mexicans so how can you be trusted? You can’t. It’s a majority draw with one judged giving it to nava get over it
          Not only do i want you to point out more than 3 clean scoring punches in round 1 for Navarrete, i want you to show me all these times Conceicao was hurt outside of the KD's like you claimed. Compu-box is corrupt and part of the corrupt TopRank system. To think they would be legitimate but every other area is corrupt is quite frankly, insane.

          If you refuse and do nothing but deflect or throw fallacies about, it proves my point quite clearly.

          Why haven't you replied to the Canelo comment? Was all the evidence against the fraud a bit too much for you to handle? Usually you'd just deflect with fallacies and write nonsense in reply that serves zero purpose like you have done here. The fact you haven't says an awful lot. Truth's a b1tch isn't it.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

            Not only do i want you to point out more than 3 clean scoring punches in round 1 for Navarrete, i want you to show me all these times Conceicao was hurt outside of the KD's like you claimed. Compu-box is corrupt and part of the corrupt TopRank system. To think they would be legitimate but every other area is corrupt is quite frankly, insane.

            If you refuse and do nothing but deflect or throw fallacies about, it proves my point quite clearly.

            Why haven't you replied to the Canelo comment? Was all the evidence against the fraud a bit too much for you to handle? Usually you'd just deflect with fallacies and write nonsense in reply that serves zero purpose like you have done here. The fact you haven't says an awful lot. Truth's a b1tch isn't it.
            Truth is the fight was ruled a draw.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Robi13 View Post

              Truth is the fight was ruled a draw.
              You're running away from the truth. That's very clear. You can't dispute the facts i've put down. You've tried, and failed, so you want to pretend another corrupt decision is "Truth".

              You can't even find all these times Conceicao was supposedly hurt like you claimed either.

              I suppose it's "Truth" Canelo beat all those fighters when at their best and not when he made sure for them to be at their worst before taking them on and making an entire career out of it? Truth can't be disputed no matter how much you run from it. Lies and delusion however can be obliterated with sufficient ease though.

              Enjoy your "Hero".

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP