I think somehow there's a lack of communication between us. You've completely mis-read what I posted, more than once, so let me make it clear:
I give Froch credit and I've been supporting him on here for a long time.
However, I can spot some flaws and I understand why some might pick holes in his technique. If that hurts you, there's **** all I can do. If you feel like jumping down someone's throat, there are probably more willing forum members to pick a fight with.
theres no lack of communication...you coming out with awful posts such as " froch is unskilled" and taylor outboxed him for 90 percent of the fight(even though the american hbo pundits completely disagreed)...the fact that froch won the last 3 rounds shows that you have failed before you have started...
theres no lack of communication...you coming out with awful posts such as " froch is unskilled" and taylor outboxed him for 90 percent of the fight(even though the american hbo pundits completely disagreed)...the fact that froch won the last 3 rounds shows that you have failed before you have started...
theres no lack of communication...you coming out with awful posts such as " froch is unskilled" and taylor outboxed him for 90 percent of the fight(even though the american hbo pundits completely disagreed)...the fact that froch won the last 3 rounds shows that you have failed before you have started...
Now get the **** of my thread...
You have issues.
Can you not see the difference between "Froch is unskilled" and what I actually said, which was Froch is slightly less technically skilled than someone like Taylor or Kessler, but is no less of a fighter?
Seriously?
And also you're really ****ing nitpicking by focusing on 90%. Would you be happy if I said he was out-boxed for 80% of the fight instead, or are you gonna start whining about that as well?
Comment