Comments Thread For: Paramount Global To Shut Down Showtime Sports; Network Will No Longer Broadcast Boxing

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wrecksracer
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 3703
    • 2,690
    • 2,560
    • 28,783

    #181
    Originally posted by dan-b

    He may have had some reasonable points, but he has that annoying habit forumites have of trying too hard and playing to a gallery. "Comically bad", "******est take", etc. He just means he disagrees but that sounds less dramatic.
    yep. Network TV did turn their back on boxing after that Mancini fight. However, moving to cable wasn't what drove boxing into the ground. It was the $80 PPV for any decent fight.

    Comment

    • BennyBlanco
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Apr 2004
      • 859
      • 49
      • 13
      • 16,690

      #182
      Originally posted by wrecksracer

      Your clown take is hilarious. Nobody is paying $80 per episode for Game of Thrones. That's what ran boxing from a popular attraction into what it is now.
      You're still missing the point.

      PPV became necessary because ad-supported networks ("free" TV, and even cable to some extent) stopped supporting the sport because they couldn't get sponsors to support it. PPV was a symptom, or a result, not the cause of boxing's problems.

      If your theory were true, then DAZN would have actually been successful, since for years their promise was no PPVs. But that clearly didn't work, as even DAZN had to capitulate and incorporate PPVs because that's the business model that the greatest number of boxing fans support.

      If fans wanted to pay a subscription instead of PPVs, DAZN would run boxing. Instead they failed in the US and essentially pulled out in favor of international focus.

      Comment

      • wrecksracer
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 3703
        • 2,690
        • 2,560
        • 28,783

        #183
        Originally posted by BennyBlanco

        You're still missing the point.

        PPV became necessary because ad-supported networks ("free" TV, and even cable to some extent) stopped supporting the sport because they couldn't get sponsors to support it. PPV was a symptom, or a result, not the cause of boxing's problems.

        If your theory were true, then DAZN would have actually been successful, since for years their promise was no PPVs. But that clearly didn't work, as even DAZN had to capitulate and incorporate PPVs because that's the business model that the greatest number of boxing fans support.

        If fans wanted to pay a subscription instead of PPVs, DAZN would run boxing. Instead they failed in the US and essentially pulled out in favor of international focus.
        Promoters offered top boxers more than they were worth, hoping that they could recoup the money with PPV. That's what really happened. If the market decided what fighters were actually worth, they would be getting paid much less. This was all on boxing promoters.

        Comment

        • bchap05
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 124
          • 15
          • 4
          • 7,199

          #184
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn

          Ok I agree with you. But deals ending terrible isn’t a reflection of the promoters, it’s a reflection of where boxing is in the sports landscape.

          When the networks left the sport, we as fans were fortunate that the cable networks picked up the sport.

          But even they changed when boxing was still popular. USA Tuesday night fights got replaced. FNF got replaced.

          Now there is soccer, cornhole, high school sports and other things that get stronger ratings on that never were in the past.

          Most of those do horrible ratings and worse than boxing: The 34 Major League Soccer regular season matches televised on ABC and ESPN networks in 2022 delivered an average audience of 343,000 viewers

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 69264
            • 9,488
            • 7,834
            • 287,568

            #185
            Originally posted by bchap05


            Most of those do horrible ratings and worse than boxing: The 34 Major League Soccer regular season matches televised on ABC and ESPN networks in 2022 delivered an average audience of 343,000 viewers
            Is that actually worse than boxing on TV?

            what about all the other sports on?

            Comment

            • rickJen
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2017
              • 8764
              • 822
              • 112
              • 118,371

              #186
              Originally posted by BennyBlanco

              You're still missing the point.

              PPV became necessary because ad-supported networks ("free" TV, and even cable to some extent) stopped supporting the sport because they couldn't get sponsors to support it. PPV was a symptom, or a result, not the cause of boxing's problems.

              If your theory were true, then DAZN would have actually been successful, since for years their promise was no PPVs. But that clearly didn't work, as even DAZN had to capitulate and incorporate PPVs because that's the business model that the greatest number of boxing fans support.

              If fans wanted to pay a subscription instead of PPVs, DAZN would run boxing. Instead they failed in the US and essentially pulled out in favor of international focus.
              PPV became necessary because fighters/managers/promoters became too greedy.
              Showtime is not free tv. You pay for subscription. And not all boxing is PPV.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP