Comments Thread For: Zurdo Ramirez Wants To Run Things Back With Dmitry Bivol

[_Rexy_]

Canelo publicly stated that he wanted the rematch, he then tried to negotiate the rematch, then publicly stated that Bivol was making rematch negotiations difficult, then finally made a public statement that he was moving on after having tried hard to make the rematch.

That is all verifiable.

Canelo wanting to depend on crooked scorecards (name all these supposed fights that Canelo won when he actually should have lost) is not verifiable and made up on your part.

What's verifiable, is that there was a rematch clause from the first fight. Zero need to "negotiate" All he had to do was activate the rematch clause, and the fight happens at the terms that were in the original contract.


Wanted to fight GGG and Ryder instead, while telling the boxing media that Bivol wouldn't negotiate

[_Rexy_]

Just before the Charlo fight he posted in Twitter he wanted Canelo at 168 for Undisputed. I don't hear he wants Zurdo again at Cruiserweight. Bivol has never fought in another weight class, has never unified, let alone Undisputed. If he so great he should be shooting for Undisputed at 175. He is looking for PAY DAY PAY DAY. Atleast Canelo has the courage to move in weight class, something Bivol has never done.

The ginger fraud you claim has the best Resume in Boxing. Imagine the other boxers, weak.

Are you ******ed? Why TF would he call for a Zurdo rematch at Cruiserweight?

[boxingitis]

Are you ******ed? Why TF would he call for a Zurdo rematch at Cruiserweight?

Why would he called Canelo for a fight at super middle weight. PAY DAY, PAY DAY. He has Beterbiev right in his own Division.

[ShoulderRoll]

What's verifiable, is that there was a rematch clause from the first fight. Zero need to "negotiate" All he had to do was activate the rematch clause, and the fight happens at the terms that were in the original contract.


Wanted to fight GGG and Ryder instead, while telling the boxing media that Bivol wouldn't negotiate

After he fought GGG and Ryder he pursued the Bivol rematch. Yes or no?

[just the facts]

Many people disagree with you about the Hagler decision.

So Sugar Ray Leonard benefiting from scorecards twice is more than Canelo benefiting one time against GGG.

Your math is phucked up just like your thinking. Leonard clearly beat Hagler and the 2nd Hearns fight was a toss up. Canelo clearly lost to GGG and the Lara and GGG2 fights were toss ups. What other fights did Leonard get outrageous scores in his favor?

Admit it, there’s never been a fighter that has ever gotten more crooked scorecards in his favor than Canelo. Not one ever.

[Airtioteclint]

This fool did worse than canelo who himself did pretty bad. He need to look elsewhere.

[ShoulderRoll]

Your math is phucked up just like your thinking. Leonard clearly beat Hagler and the 2nd Hearns fight was a toss up. Canelo clearly lost to GGG and the Lara and GGG2 fights were toss ups. What other fights did Leonard get outrageous scores in his favor?

Admit it, there’s never been a fighter that has ever gotten more crooked scorecards in his favor than Canelo. Not one ever.

The Hagler-Leonard decision was controversial and people historically have been split on the winner. You know that. Nothing clear about it.

And Sugar Ray Leonard himself has said that Hearns deserved the nod in their second fight.

[just the facts]

The Hagler-Leonard decision was controversial and people historically have been split on the winner. You know that. Nothing clear about it.

And Sugar Ray Leonard himself has said that Hearns deserved the nod in their second fight.

While you’re entitled to your own opinion, you’re not entitled to your own facts. There was nothing controversial about Leonard/Hagler. Clear win for Leonard (still hurts to say). Historically split 85/15 in favor of Leonard.

Admit it there’s never been a professional boxer that has EVER benefited from crooked scorecards as much as Canelo has. And it’s been consistent too.

All this is just agenda driven bu!!shyte on your part.

[ShoulderRoll]

While you’re entitled to your own opinion, you’re not entitled to your own facts. There was nothing controversial about Leonard/Hagler. Clear win for Leonard (still hurts to say). Historically split 85/15 in favor of Leonard.

Naw. The Hagler-Leonard fight still has people arguing and divided to this day. Hell, make a poll thread about it on NSB right now if you want. The results won’t show no 85/15 split.

Nice try, though.

Admit it there’s never been a professional boxer that has EVER benefited from crooked scorecards as much as Canelo has. And it’s been consistent too.

All this is just agenda driven bu!!shyte on your part.

I have patiently broken down for you how the fighter that should have won the fight DID win the fight on the scorecards in every Canelo bout except one. Or maybe two, if you’re desperate and insist on including the close Lara fight. There has been professional boxers that have benefitted more than that, including Ray Leonard.

You’re entitled to have your own whacky opinions but you’re not entitled to push your bullshyte anti-Canelo agenda as if it were fact.

[just the facts]

Naw. The Hagler-Leonard fight still has people arguing and divided to this day. Hell, make a poll thread about it on NSB right now if you want. The results won’t show no 85/15 split.

Nice try, though.



I have patiently broken down for you how the fighter that should have won the fight DID win the fight on the scorecards in every Canelo bout except one. Or maybe two, if you’re desperate and insist on including the close Lara fight. There has been professional boxers that have benefitted more than that, including Ray Leonard.

You’re entitled to have your own whacky opinions but you’re not entitled to push your bullshyte anti-Canelo agenda as if it were fact.

More agenda driven bu!!shyte. The fact remains, there has never been a professional fighter that has benefited from crooked scorecards more than Canelo has.