It was resisted so long, there was no reason to cave. When I take this position, people often misinterpret it as support for the Big Three. It's not, it's just we had enough problems.
It also creates problems when discussing historical standings of fighters. Tommy Morrison, for example, should not be recognised as a titleholder, never mind a champion.
The Big Three could have continued treating it like the IBO, i.e. a second rate belt which does not remove you from the rankings or hold any leverage in a unification.
If you disagree, explain how the boxing public has benefitted from WBOgus recognition.
It also creates problems when discussing historical standings of fighters. Tommy Morrison, for example, should not be recognised as a titleholder, never mind a champion.
The Big Three could have continued treating it like the IBO, i.e. a second rate belt which does not remove you from the rankings or hold any leverage in a unification.
If you disagree, explain how the boxing public has benefitted from WBOgus recognition.
Comment