The Klitschko brothers Gain Weight during training camp...ODD

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dchampishere
    El Boxeador Cubano
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 470
    • 65
    • 4
    • 6,799

    #41
    do people forget that vit tested positive in the olympics? and odds are his brother was on them to but just didnt test positive, and no they wouldnt do that as pros with millions on the line. get the f*uk out of here! thats like evander never tested positive either but is on the **** too. there are ped that can not be tested for. some of these posters need to wake up and look at the pro world of all sports, its just the way it is.

    Comment

    • βetamax
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 3838
      • 430
      • 55
      • 10,171

      #42
      Originally posted by Carnivore
      The difference is, there IS evidence that Mosley has used steroids.

      Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!


      There is NO evidence that Pacquiao or the Klitschkos used steroids during their professional careers.


      Mosley was questioned for something that took place in '03. The Margarito fight was in '09 at time when this balco news was coming out but he even admitted it back in '07. You really think someone would be dumb enough to take steroids when there is that type of heat on them? That would be like Margarito coming into his next fight with loaded wraps.

      I could use the same argument towards Vitali. He was kicked off of the Ukrainian olympic team for using steroids so it's not like he's beyond breaking the rules of a sport, amateur or pro.

      So according to your logic:

      Vitali admits to using steroids in '96, therefore there is NO way anyone should dare accuse him of taking steroids in '09.

      Mosley in '07 admits to taking steroids in '03 but it's perfectly acceptable to accuse him in '09.

      What makes more sense - accusing someone when the issue is fresh on people's minds thus making it more risky or accusing them years later when most people have forgotten?
      Last edited by βetamax; 10-06-2009, 02:00 PM.

      Comment

      • PensionKiller
        Khan Kills Kell
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 9521
        • 224
        • 207
        • 18,489

        #43
        Originally posted by mt102879
        Mosley was questioned for something that took place in '03. The Margarito fight was in '09 at time when this balco news was coming out but he even admitted it back in '07. You really think someone would be dumb enough to take steroids when there is that type of heat on them? That would be like Margarito coming into his next fight with loaded wraps.

        I could use the same argument towards Vitali. He was kicked off of the Ukrainian olympic team for using steroids so it's not like he's beyond breaking the rules of a sport, amateur or pro.

        So according to your logic:

        Vitali admits to using steroids in '96, therefore there is NO way anyone should dare accuse him of taking steroids in '09.

        Mosley in '07 admits to taking steroids in '03 but it's perfectly acceptable to accuse him in '09.

        What makes more sense - accusing someone when the issue is fresh on people's minds thus making it more risky or accusing them years later when most people have forgotten?
        No way I am saying these are the same, but if a man ****d a girl 6 years ago, would you leave him with your daughter?

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP