do you consider clottey a better boxer then hatton

[Junito-Rulez]

Clottey and it's not even debatable, he's more skilled, faster, has better defense, more accurate punches, better counter attacks, bigger, stronger. Hatton would get his ass kicked against Clottey. If you disagree with me on this you don't know **** about boxing.

Clottey deserves a rematch after Cotto's done with the little man, Plastercheato and Gayfeather.

[Pugilistic™]

Clottey would destroy Hatton.

Hatton's inside tactics would have no effect on Clottey's tough guard and he would be eating leather on the way in also.

[Alexandros]

hatton cant tek his pounches.... end

[catalinul]

Better boxer in what way?

More accomplished?No.

H2H?Yes.

[The_Demon]

better boxer
less accomplisments

[taino78]

lolz lets be real now


hatton would destroy clottey p4p

a pac fan would say that. they dont wanna think that cotto had the stiffer competition. he'll tear pac apart to prove it.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Clottey is definitely the better all round boxer but he hasnt achieved as much as Hatton throughout his career and may never do so.

[Ryn0]

In terms of technical ability Clottey is better, but Hatton in a P4P match up (maybe even a head to head matchup a few years ago) might win it because Clottey hasn't much power (look to the Corrales fight) and I doubt he could drop the Hatton that fought Tszyu, Clottey would win some rounds off defence and countering but Hattons workrate might seal it like all of Clotteys big fights. Right now Hatton would lose though, hes past it now too many wars, hasn't looked after his body and been KO'd twice.

[ORANGEY]

Clottey is better in all aspects, but he doesnt have the warrior like desire that Hatton does inside the ring

[D-MiZe]

but hatton beats clottey p4p

What?